<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crop wild relative helps Kew reach 10% milestone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agro.biodiver.se/2009/10/crop-wild-relative-helps-kew-reach-10-milestone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agro.biodiver.se/2009/10/crop-wild-relative-helps-kew-reach-10-milestone/</link>
	<description>Crops, animals, wild relatives ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:31:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelagh</title>
		<link>http://agro.biodiver.se/2009/10/crop-wild-relative-helps-kew-reach-10-milestone/comment-page-1/#comment-815166</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agro.biodiver.se/?p=8859#comment-815166</guid>
		<description>In our FAO CGRFA study we cited this species as being used for water-logging resistance (INIBAP/IPGRI, 2006 – Global Conservation Strategy for &lt;em&gt;Musa&lt;/em&gt;). 

We found that for the high priority &lt;em&gt;Musa &lt;/em&gt;taxa (including itinerans, a primary wild relative) occurrence data were lacking in online databases. Data were so sketchy that we were unable to do any sensible mapping. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pgrforum.org/documents/Global_in_situ_CWR_conservation_network.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;We highlighted&lt;/a&gt; the need for a detailed ecogeographic survey of this group.

By the way, the study is finally being published formally—currently a summary version for the Commission meeting next week, plus the full version later. Better check those taxon names though—MS Word has kindly &#039;corrected&#039; some, e.g., &#039;acuminate&#039; (just noticed!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our FAO CGRFA study we cited this species as being used for water-logging resistance (INIBAP/IPGRI, 2006 – Global Conservation Strategy for <em>Musa</em>). </p>
<p>We found that for the high priority <em>Musa </em>taxa (including itinerans, a primary wild relative) occurrence data were lacking in online databases. Data were so sketchy that we were unable to do any sensible mapping. <a href="http://www.pgrforum.org/documents/Global_in_situ_CWR_conservation_network.pdf" rel="nofollow">We highlighted</a> the need for a detailed ecogeographic survey of this group.</p>
<p>By the way, the study is finally being published formally—currently a summary version for the Commission meeting next week, plus the full version later. Better check those taxon names though—MS Word has kindly &#8216;corrected&#8217; some, e.g., &#8216;acuminate&#8217; (just noticed!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

