<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mapping threats to crop wild relatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agro.biodiver.se/2009/10/mapping-threats-to-crop-wild-relatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agro.biodiver.se/2009/10/mapping-threats-to-crop-wild-relatives/</link>
	<description>Crops, animals, wild relatives ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:34:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian</title>
		<link>http://agro.biodiver.se/2009/10/mapping-threats-to-crop-wild-relatives/comment-page-1/#comment-816662</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agro.biodiver.se/?p=9028#comment-816662</guid>
		<description>Interesting. The most sampled areas are actually more likely to be threatened (or more likely to be close to a threatened area). Not unexpected though. Expansion of anthropogenic activities leads to further and more detailed sampling, so you get more samples, but then more threats. It&#039;s a cycle. 

The relationship, I guess, changes when you involve the protected areas locations, so the more sampled areas become the most conserved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. The most sampled areas are actually more likely to be threatened (or more likely to be close to a threatened area). Not unexpected though. Expansion of anthropogenic activities leads to further and more detailed sampling, so you get more samples, but then more threats. It&#8217;s a cycle. </p>
<p>The relationship, I guess, changes when you involve the protected areas locations, so the more sampled areas become the most conserved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://agro.biodiver.se/2009/10/mapping-threats-to-crop-wild-relatives/comment-page-1/#comment-816377</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agro.biodiver.se/?p=9028#comment-816377</guid>
		<description>Green is potato, blue is peanut, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Green is potato, blue is peanut, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

