- Old California olives shared. More details later, I hope.
- Livestock in the balance, an FAO report. Did we already gnaw on this?
- Assessing urban biodiversity. Any veg with that?
- How to share biodiversity data. Any informatics with that?
- Fromgirls??? Cheesecake urges surrender-monkeys to eat more cheese.
- Biocultural Diversity Conservation, a new book from earthscan. We’ll let you know about ag when we’ve seen it.
- Challenges for Tanzanian seed sector. (No, not that blasted sorghum.)
Welcome, Carnival goers
If you’ve just arrived here from Scientia Pro Publica, welcome. We’re never quite sure where we fit in the overall “science” matrix. Agronomy is science, sure, and so is plant breeding, mostly, and GMOs well, obviously. But stuff like making better use of agrobiodiversity often sits uncomfortably with people who want simple solutions to problems that they see as simple too. Not enough water? Irrigate! Saline soil? Breed saline tolerance! Missing vitamin A? Engineer it into a staple!
So it was interesting to find Eric Michael Johnson’s analysis of policy options for Haiti at the latest Scientia Pro Publica. The main thrust seems to be that rewarding Haitian farmers for good behaviour rather than punishing them for bad is more likely to have the beneficial impacts sought as Haiti struggles back from disaster. Trouble is, the policy analysts seems to think that using high-tech seeds and more fertilizer are the best good behaviours to incentivize; there are other options, you know. And as Johnson points out, the government of Haiti is not allowed to subsidize its farmers, not even for seeds and fertilizer. This is nuts. So is Mauka to Maui’s wonderful story of The ant and the toad, in a good way. 1
Featured: Genebanks
Glenn thinks we ought to formalise the social network needs of breeders, genebank managers et al.
Does this type of discussion occur naturally? Or do we need something to motivate it? … Maybe we should do something about it?
We could write up a project and find somebody to fund it. Maybe it would be a risky project — social networking for crop improvement (genetic resources use) … But would it be any riskier than the current database hell projects?
Good point, well made. Off you go.