Nibbles: Carnival, Strawberries, Wheat, Malawi, Books

So we were missed, after all

Easing back into the never-ending treadmill that is blogging, I thought I’d share with you one reader’s appreciation of our efforts:

Thanks for writing on this subject. There’s a bunch of important technical information on the internet nowadays. You’ve got a lot of that info here on your blog. I’m highly impressed – I try to keep a couple of blogs pretty neat, but it’s seemingly impossible at times. You have done a solid job with this one in particular. How do you manage to do it?

Thanks for that sincere and heartfelt praise, Mr Spammy, of Tips to Losing Weight, and in answer to your penetrating question, sometimes I wonder myself.

Good news, everyone

We’re taking a break for a couple of weeks or thereabouts. That’s not the only good news, though. Our parting gift to you is an episode of Futurama. 1 Not just any old episode, mind you, but the 2010 Xmas Special, which demonstrated just how deeply into popular culture the Doomsday Vault has penetrated. Here’s a clip. 2

Monomaniacs will of course care only for those 2 minutes. We urge you to watch the entire episode, which contains more delightful and insightful jokes than you can shake a stick at. Personally, I’ve always preferred Futurama to the Simpsons, and this just confirms me in my ways.

See you soon.

Nuts for pears

A funny thing happened to Dave Arnold on his globe-trotting effort to sample the apples of the world: he got waylaid by the pears. What happened next is the subject of a truly wonderful blog post that highlights his enthusiasm and ability to convey subtleties of the eating experience. Not bad for a chap who “helps chefs achieve their most ambitious goals using new technologies, techniques, and ingredients … including sous vide and hydrocolloids”. But of course, a trained mind and a trained palate can tackle anything, to whit:

  • Cayuga … tasted of Nik-L-Nips 3
  • Hermansverk 1/1 tasted of canned black California olives
  • Perdue 41 was a dead ringer for giant water-bug essence

Seriously, this is a tour de force, and you know we don’t use that term lightly. The tragedy is that Brogdale makes next to no use of its riches.

Why it matters to think coherently about food, nutrition and agriculture

I’ve been mulling over how best to respond to Anastasia’s frustration with my disparaging remarks. We clearly agree that people need good nutrition to achieve their potential. We agree that “the cost of vitamin distribution is very high because you have to keep doing it,” to which I would add that handing the private sector a license to print money in the US and Europe probably didn’t help. We disagree, fundamentally, on two issues.

First, I do not believe that “once [farmers] have the trait in their possession they can keep breeding with it, farming it, and eating the food produced for however long they like”. At a technical level, I can see how farmers might be encouraged to maintain selection for a nice obvious trait like the orange colour associated with vitamin A precursors, and even breed it from the one or two varieties they might be given into the ones they might otherwise prefer to grow. I don’t see how they are going to do that for high zinc or high iron or high lysine types. And they are going to need a very wide range of staple varieties if those genetically uniform varieties are going to thrive under a wide diversity of growing regimes while not succumbing to a pest or disease epidemic. So that’s one set of concerns.

The other is that although people (and not just Anastasia) may be saying that supplementation and fortification and biofortification each have a part to play in tackling specific sorts of malnutrition — oh yes, and dietary diversity too — that isn’t how they behave when push comes to shove. Anastasia herself disses “vitamin distribution” and “kitchen gardens”. She cares about them but won’t switch focus, and that’s fine. I’m not going to switch my focus either, no matter how frustrating it may be. Everyone — me included — seems to treat funding for the fight against malnutrition as a zero-sum game. Biofortification, in my view, is blocking investment in dietary diversity. I disparage the simplistic sales pitch that allows it to do so with donors who aren’t equipped to understand the problems it raises.

Anastasia says:

Provide the micro nutrients needed and then people gain the ability to set up their own gardens.

To which I say, provide not gardens, but sustainable dietary diversity, and people won’t need the micronutrients in biofortified staples. Indeed I go further: let the various “solutions” to malnutrition come together in an overarching programme of research in which people with a stake in the outcome, but no interest in the individual approaches, apportion funding support. That way maybe I can stop bleating and get back to cultivating my garden while Anastasia can get back to engineering better nutrition into staples.

Which brings me, finally, to my real point and the stimulus to write this post. 4 Cornell University recently made available a video of a meeting held on 23 November to launch The African Food System and Its Interaction with Human Health and Nutrition, a book edited by Per Pinstrup-Andersen. The video is no great shakes to look at, but the content is wonderful and music to my ears, and possibly Anastasia’s too. Do give it a listen.

There were many, many sound-bites in there deserving of wider notice. I particularly liked Anna Herforth’s definition of good nutrition as being based on “consistent access to a diverse diet”. 5 And I look forward to Rebecca Nelson making good on her pledge, as a grant-maker, to get other grant-makers interested in dietary diversity. I’ll have to try and get hold of a copy of the book. I’d also like very respectfully to suggest that someone at Cornell or elsewhere gets hold of Ted and does a number with the contributors and their work to put these ideas before a much wider audience.

Anastasia isn’t the only one round here who is frustrated, believe me.