Maize location, location location…

A quick search on Genesys revealed 302 maize accessions from above 1500 masl in the Himalayas, and 62 above 2500 masl. Of course, there are many more maize accessions from high altitudes in Central and South America, but their photoperiod adaptation (among other things) is likely to be quite different.

That’s from a post I put up here a few days ago. Some people said I should back up that “among other things,” so here goes.

I extracted from Genesys lat/longs for 2,388 maize landrace accessions collected above 2000 masl in the Andes, and for 96 in the Himalayas. I then asked ChatGPT to calculate separate averages for the two sets of accession collecting localities for two climate variables, i.e. mean annual temperature and precipitation. It asked me to supply it with the WorldClim data as a zip file, which I duly did.

It told me the Andean sites had a mean annual temperature of about 12°C and the Himalayan ones of about 6°C. Mean annual precipitation was around 750mm and 640mm, respectively. So there could well be some significant overall differences in adaptation between the two sets of germplasm.

But…

I used the coarsest WorldClim dataset, which is probably not a great idea in mountain areas. And many accessions were collected at the same sites: those 96 Himalayan maizes for example come from only 52 distinct places. I should probably have only used unique collecting localities to make the calculations. The “Subsetting Tool” in Genesys does do that, and displays nice histograms, but it doesn’t give you average values for the whole subset. Incidentally, when I looked at the histogram for total precipitation for the Himalayan material, there was a suspiciously big spike way at the dry end. Really not sure what’s happening there.

Maybe some climatologists or geographers or GIS jockeys can explain. And do a better analysis. And come up with a really easy way of extracting climate data for a long list of localities.

Brainfood: Diversity of Oats, Cotton, Sugarcane, Rice, Amaranthus, Vegetables, Agroforestry, Value chains

The wild bunch

Never rains but it pours. Along very similar lines as the previous post on a fun effort to document people’s favourite breadfruit varieties, here comes the FruitDev project’s Wild Fruit Population of the Month.

Each month, the series highlights one (or more) populations identified by a FRUITDIV partner, illustrating how field exploration, local knowledge, and cross-partner collaboration contribute to a better understanding of wild fruit genetic resources.

By focusing on individual populations, the series aims to make visible the often-overlooked genetic diversity found in natural and semi-natural landscapes, many of which are shaped by environmental pressures such as drought, poor soils, or past disturbances. These populations represent valuable reservoirs of adaptive traits that are increasingly relevant for resilience, conservation, and future breeding strategies.

This month’s featured population is a dwarf almond from North Macedonia. Nice idea.