Nibbles: Gates & Slim, Aquino, Home genebank, Quinoa indigestion, Cornish pasties, Exotic vegetables, Funny cheeses, Leafsnap, Beekeeping

  • Bigshots visit CIMMYT, miss opportunity to mention genebank. No, wait
  • Bigshot visits IRRI, including genebank.
  • Yeah but who needs those anyway, you can make your own!
  • Now the French want their say on quinoa.
  • Speaking of the French, you think there is any horsemeat in Cornish pasties?
  • “I grew up with zucchini, but I prefer the flavor and texture of angled luffa.”
  • Gotta love the fact that there’s a thing called the Rogue Creamery.
  • Missed the fact that Leafsnap had been named one of the top 10 science apps of 2012.
  • Germans report on Italians helping Ethiopians. To keep bees. One suspects Ethiopians could teach Italians and Germans a thing or two about keeping bees, but that’s another story.

Nibbles: The Valentine’s Edition. What’s not to love?

Nibbles: Ancient farming, AnGR, Biofortification, Sustainable diets, Pomegranate project

What’s that got to do with the price of food?

The various food price indices seem to offer a simple way to gauge the price of food. High index price means people have to pay more for food, right? And beastly speculators create price spikes, right? Up to a point, Lord Copper. I confess, I’ve been guilty of jumping to the first conclusion and of rubbishing the second. But my knowledge is third-hand at best. So I’m happy to point you to a thoughtful analysis on the always interesting Resources Research website.

Makanaka rakes over the FAO Food Price Index and the same organisation’s Agricultural Market Information System, and discovers that they paint rather different pictures. He also explains why that should be so and, more trenchantly, that because many of the components of both reports are averages of indices of yet more averages of global trade numbers, they really don’t carry much value for the vast majority of people who grow and eat food. As for speculators, while I still don’t believe they cause price spikes, I’m fascinated by this:

Why the international trade and export quotations numbers dominate is revealed, in a roundabout way, by a regular paragraph in the AMIS Market Monitor. The monthly pronouncement has this to say about investment flows (that is, money chasing foodgrain), for 2013 February: “Managed money was a significant seller of wheat, maize and soybeans as futures prices attained early January lows prior to USDA stocks report”. Pay attention to that term, ‘managed money’, which means funds run by banks and big investment agencies. “Managed money reversed its position in wheat from long (bullish) to short (bearish) but maintains long positions in maize and soybeans.” Now the confusion should clear somewhat. The index helps traders and exchanges deal better with volumes of grain (and dairy and meat and edible oil). AMIS helps them with a great deal more sophistication.

Got that? Investors think the price of wheat is coming down, while that of maize and soybeans is going up. No word on horsemeat.

Nibbles: Maize genes, Livestock domestication, Guinea fowl, Plant identification, Juniper conservation, Cacao conservation, Seed talk, IPBES report, Global consultation