Food and Security: diverse views agree

The timing on the E. coli outbreak in Europe is perfect: right on the heels of the "periphery" debt crises, you’ve got the same countries (Spain, etc.) squared off against the same "victims" (Germany foots the bailout bill disproportionally and now suffers disproportionally on this tainted food outbreak). Bottom line: you – Mr. Terrorist – have created tons of enmity, economic loss, and discombobulating fear. If I’m al Qaeda, I’m claiming this one on principle.

Thomas Barnett’s take on the ways in which food impacts our future security are disconcerting, interesting, scary, and in a warped way rather entertaining.

And then there’s this, from a commentary on the G8‘s recent meeting in Deauville:

[T]he world is now better able to feed itself. But the same economic stimuli that underpin higher food output also lead to supply problems, a decline in living standards, and massive social strains, especially in urban centers.

This is important to bear in mind, because rising food prices have historically been the trigger for political revolutions. The three revolutions that made the modern world, in France, Russia, and China, all had their immediate origins in food shortages, fear of hunger, and disputes about food pricing.

Luckily I know better than to quote ancient Chinese proverbs.

Nibbles: ITPGRFA, Hotspots, Adaptation, Agrobiodiversity, Potatoes and climate change, Cowpeas and drought, Apios, Tree planting, Fairtrade, Egyptian archaeobotany, Bolivian video

EU needs to coordinate to strategize to conserve genetic diversity

Last week we briefly Nibbled the Seeds for a Sustainable Future conference organised by European Greens and held yesterday. Despite the very short notice, an agrobiodiverse mole tunnelled her way into the proceedings and sent back a report.

Claudia Olazabal, Head of Biodiversity, which comes under the Nature Conservation & Biodiversity Unit at DG ENVI, asked “Is agricultural biodiversity part of the equation?” in her presentation on diversity of genetic resources in the context of international commitments and the EU’s Biodiversity Strategy. During which presentation, she referred to Action 10, that “The Commission and Member States will encourage the uptake of agri-environmental measures to support genetic diversity in agriculture and explore the scope for developing a strategy for the conservation of genetic diversity.”

A questioner managed to ask: Hadn’t the Commission been working on just such a strategy since 1994? ((I certainly remember giving evidence back then. Ed.))

To which Mrs Olabazal extemporized thusly:

“There are lots of different actors in the Commission who work on agricultural genetic diversity – Directorate General for Environment, Directorate General for Agriculture, Directorate General for Research … we need to coordinate … “

Ah yes. A need to coordinate across Europe’s complex network of interests. It wasn’t like that in 1994, when everything was at least under one roof. But then again, maybe that’s why there still isn’t really a strategy for the conservation of genetic diversity …

Alas, I think you’ve missed your chance to tell the EU what you think of its “Options and analysis of possible scenarios for the review of the European Union legislation on the marketing of seed and plant propagating material”.

Nibbles: Cassava, Biopiracy, Neolithic, Potato history, Pollinator conservation