SOTWP Day 1: Climate change, protected areas and extinction risk

In which our friend Nora Castañeda summarizes the first day of the State of the World’s Plants Symposium.

The first day of the Kew symposium was divided in three sessions: climate change, protected areas and extinction risk.

Dr Kay Havens from the Chicago Botanic Gardens opened the first session, presenting some of the responses that plants may display to climate change, such as: plasticity, adaptation and migration. Dr Havens recommended gathering seeds from the fringes of environmental niches, as a strategy to obtain useful adaptations to rapid climate change.

Following this, Dr Alistair Seddon presented his work on the relative response of ecosystems to climate variability. Prof. Sandra Díaz then described the major plant traits (and their combinations) that are currently dominant among plants. This is useful for vegetation and ecosystem modelling. Closing the climate change section, Prof. Yadvinder Malhi presented his research on the impacts of climate change on tropical forests. Did you know that logging can have a similar effect as climate change. You can find a comprehensive summary of Prof. Malhi’s research online.

Dr Iain Darbyshire opened the session on protected areas with his work on Tropical Important Plant Areas, followed by Lize von Staden and the technical approach that the South African National Biodiversity Institute is successfully using to establish in situ conservation priorities. Prof. William Laurance shared some of the considerations that should be taken into account for conserving plant diversity in natural reserves, including where roads and infrastructure should be built, the effectiveness of protected areas to meet their conservation objectives and the importance of connectivity between protected areas in the tropics. He introduced us to PADDDtracker:

We think of national parks and protected areas as permanent fixtures on the landscape, but recent research points to the widespread (but largely overlooked) protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD). In response, PADDDtracker.org is documenting the patterns, trends, causes, and consequences of PADDD. PADDDtracker.org allows you to learn about PADDD and share your experiences with the world: where has PADDD already happened? Where has PADDD been proposed? Why is PADDD happening?

The session closed with Diego Juffe-Bignoli from UNEP-WCMC discussing the contributions of protected areas to meeting international biodiversity targets (Aichi, GSPC and SDG).

For the extinction risk session, Prof. Quentin Cronk introduced the term “living dead” to describe those beautiful, large but lonely trees that are often seen in the middle of pastures (common in recently deforested regions). Living outside of their preferred ecological conditions and displaying no regeneration, they have little chance of long-term survival. Prof. Cronk was followed by Prof. David Richardson, who talked about the impacts of invasive plant species on native plant populations.

Then, Steve Bachman, one of the brains behind the Sampled Red List Index for Plants, presented current and future plans for continuing Red Listing plants, current advances in uploading assessments to the IUCN RedList, the need to increase the availability of data for assessing biodiversity threats, and approaches to improving the quality of data derived from citizen science. Prof. Vololoniaina Jeannoda closed the day with her presentation of the ongoing efforts to conserve the oviala — also known as the yams of the forest — in Madagascar. That’s crop wild relatives: more on that on day 2, as you’ll soon see.

Baobabs and palms for sale

Just a quick follow-up to my post a few days back on the Madrid botanical garden. There is a small shop at the entrance, and you can get some pretty weird plants there, like baobabs, for instance, of all things. Not, alas, any of the local grapes and olives on display within. Which seems like an opportunity missed. Some of those olives could even be xylella-resistant.

shop

Blogging the state of our plants

Our friend Nora Castañeda attended the State of the World’s Plants Symposium a couple of weeks back and was kind enough to send us some of her impressions. We’ll publish them in instalments over the next few days. Thanks, Nora.

Last week, Kew organized and hosted the very first State of the World’s Plants Symposium. The event was preceded by the publication of the State of the World’s Plants report, which this blog and other press outlets have mentioned already. The report is complemented by an interactive website that in a very user-friendly interface enables visitors to explore further details and useful data sources (some of the data sources are only available online).

The State of the World’s Plants report and symposium come at a perfect time. As Prof. Kathy Willis said in the introduction of the event, we currently have state of the world reports for a plethora of topics (including fathers), but not for plants. Until now. The report serves as a baseline of our current knowledge of plant diversity, the global threats that plants are currently and will face in the future, and the policies affecting plants. The idea is that for the next five years, we’ll see an annually updated global assessment of the state of our plants, where we’ll be able to gauge progress on the main topics addressed by the report.

As for the symposium, if I had to describe it in few words, I would say it was a series of interesting and captivating talks, combined with the participation of a very enthusiastic audience (we even became a trend on twitter with the hashtag #SOTWP. But I’d like to use the space of this and subsequent posts to share my own impressions of the symposium, together with some interesting links for the curious.

Featured: Madrid garden

Alvaro, who should know, tells us more about the Madrid botanical garden:

As far as I know, the royal botanical garden of Madrid is not part of today’s PGRFA network and programme in Spain. But it did play an important role for research in agricultural crops in the past.

Intrigued? Read more here.

Finding a good home for teosinte

Speaking of botanical gardens maintaining collections of crop diversity, this just in:

A large collection of Teosinte seed was recently transferred from Duke University to the Missouri Botanical Garden Seed Bank. Teosinte is the wild ancestor to modern corn and the preservation of its genetic material is important to corn research and supports the long term conservation of crop wild relatives. The collection includes seven different species in the genus Zea and will be stored in long-term freezer storage where it may remain viable for decades. We are in the process of accessioning, drying, counting and repackaging the seed for storage in the freezers.

The Duke collection is not mentioned either in WIEWS or the global maize conservation strategy, so it’s a little difficult to know how important it is. Interestingly, there is a maize collection mentioned in WIEWS from North Carolina State University, and that’s not that far from Duke, but still. Any way you slice it, there aren’t too many collections of wild maize relatives out there, according to the global strategy:

maize collections

It would arguably have been better for the collection to go to USDA, Ames (NCRPIS) or CIMMYT, but Rainer Bussmann, Director and William L. Brown Curator for Economic Botany at the Missouri Botanical Garden (MO) also made a perfectly good case for this option to me on Facebook:

Because we (MO) already had a (smaller) Teosinte collection, and we are housing a large corn collection, so this fit in perfectly.

So that’s another collection that the global strategy doesn’t know about. You can look for crop wild relatives on the PlantSearch database of Botanical Gardens Conservation International, but the secretive world of botanical gardens is such that this will only tell you that a particular plant exists in a garden collection somewhere, not which garden collection.

It doesn’t really matter where this Duke collection ends up, as long as it’s well taken care of, which it obviously will be at MO. But users also need to know where the stuff is, and get their hands on it. Isn’t it time botanical gardens and crop genebanks exchanged information a bit better? Rainer, how about putting the passport data on your new collection on Genesys?