Fancy maths meets haystack

One of the authors, Michael Mackay, tells us about a new book that is sure to set pulses racing.

A question anyone involved in crop improvement — breeders, pre-breeders, genebank managers, genetic resources experts of all hues — has invariably asked is: where can I find some new genetic variation to overcome this nasty new problem that’s hammering productivity in my region? We all know there is an enormous reservoir of plant genetic resources held in ex situ or in situ around the globe. To use a cliché that’s been much used but never bettered in this context: it’s all too often like looking for a needle in a haystack. Sure, molecular biology is increasingly predicting, and occasionally even delivering, a more rapid pathway to identifying and using those elusive new genes or alleles. But are we making the best possible use of the information that’s out there already?

Enter Applied Mathematics and Omics to Assess Crop Genetic Resources for Climate Change Adaptive Traits. This book, just published by CRC Press, applies the latest statistical techniques to explore plant genetic resources data of all different kinds. The aim is to help researchers create manageable, trait-specific, sub-sets of germplasm. These should end up being best-bet candidates for evaluation and further research. Think of core collections, but skewed towards — enriched for — particular traits, rather than efficiently covering diversity overall. Think of a smaller haystack with a much better chance of containing that needle.

While the book proposes a general conceptual mathematical framework for exploring how different data can be used to estimate the likelihood of specific variation existing within a given accession, there is a particular focus on climate change. It includes discussion of how genetic resources can be used to mitigate and adapt to climate change, and how different plant traits are likely to become more important as the climate changes.

So, as genebanks accumulate information on their germplasm — making the haystack ever bigger — and plant breeders come up with ever better ways to use that elusive needle, this book identifies an opportunity to bring these two communities together in the cause of adaptation to climate change. The maths needed to facilitate a more effective ‘mining’ of novel genes and alleles from the world’s genebanks is certainly fancy. But this books puts it within the reach of anyone with a computer. Or a pitchfork.

Lethal yellowing spreads in West Africa

Readers may remember our recent post on the threat to the international coconut collection in Papua New Guinea that is being posed by a new disease. Now it looks like an old disease, lethal yellowing, is likewise making strides towards another important international coconut genebank, that in Cote d’Ivoire

Screen Shot 2016-03-29 at 11.46.17 AM

…quite apart from affecting the livelihoods of an increasing number of farmers who can hardly afford the hit. See the video by Rouland Bourdeix for more details.

Featured: Agroecology

Geoff Gurr takes issue with what he interprets as our sarcasm:

The ‘no, really’ comment could be taken as suggesting that there is no great surprise contained in the title ‘…crop diversification promotes ecological intensification of agriculture’. In fact, the idea that ecological approaches such as crop diversification can have the types of beneficial effects that we report is often challenged. Had word counts allowed our title to be longer we’d have liked to have extended it to say something like ‘to the extent that the need for synthetic inputs was reduced by two thirds whilst increasing crop yield’.

Though actually what we were trying to do is point out that his results reinforce those of other papers in this week’s Brainfood.

Brainfood: Oxygen and seeds, Chicken inbreeding, Non-IPR seed laws, Biodiversity & farm management, Soil agrobiodiversity, Biodiversity & plant protection double, Genebank conservation value, Dichotomies

The long and winding road to crop wild relative conservation priorities

Those who follow these things will probably have noticed a certain frisson in the press over a paper in Nature Plants on setting conservation priorities for crop wild relatives. Lead authors are Nora Castañeda and Colin Khoury of CIAT, both of whom have featured here before. Good to see Nora celebrating the occasion on Twitter. She really deserves that beer.

Well, I think it’s a beer.

Anyway, I won’t go into the details of the findings here. As I say, it’s all over the news (well, relatively speaking), and you can always explore the results for yourself on the project’s website. But I did want to strike a historical note.

This whole thing started when a small group of us decided it would be kinda fun to apply fancy spatial analysis methods to data from herbaria and genebanks on the distribution of wild Phaseolus species in the Americas. Just to see if it could be done. And whether the results would make any sense.

Conservation priorities for wild beans

Well, it could, and they sort of did. And many years, a major international project, two PhDs and a lot of blood, sweat and tears later, we have a global analysis across dozens of genepools and hundreds of species. It was totally worth it, but there should be easier, faster and less expensive ways to get this kind of thing done.