What OSP do and do not do

Amid all the brouhaha surrounding the publication of the paper “A large-scale intervention to introduce orange sweet potato in rural Mozambique increases vitamin A intakes among children and women” in the British Journal of Nutrition, it is worth reminding ourselves what the study did and did not find.

Adoption of 6 orange-fleshed sweet potato (OSP) varieties and their displacement of white and yellow varieties in the diet of the people in the study area led to significant, important change in vitamin A intake in vulnerable groups:

…the net change in mean vitamin A intakes of the intervention groups relative to the control represented increases by 63, 169 and 42% among reference children, young children and women, respectively. These net increases were equivalent to approximately 74, 118 and 55% of the corresponding EAR for vitamin A(26) for the same groups, representing a substantial increase in dietary vitamin A.

The study also found that “estimated prevalences of inadequate vitamin A intakes by these groups commensurately decreased.” All of which is of course great. But the authors cannot be said to have found any change in the vitamin A status of people. That’s because this wasn’t measured. As the authors themselves admit:

…it is not possible to predict the impact of these increases in vitamin A intake on change in vitamin A status.

But they were not guessing wildly, of course:

One of the main reasons for not including vitamin A status indicators in the present study was that a similar but smaller-scale study in the same area serving as a precursor to the present one had already demonstrated a positive impact on children’s serum retinol concentrations following increased intake of vitamin A from OSP and other vitamin A sources.

So the argument is not entirely tied up, though it does seem pretty solid. Evaluation of nutritional and health impacts is hard.

Just a final word about diversity. Six OSP varieties were introduced and adopted, and as we’ve seen seem likely to be having a significant health impact. But are they also having an impact on the diversity of the local production systems? The authors suggest that they might: “OSP is an acceptable, local food source of vitamin A that can easily replace currently grown white or yellow sweet potato varieties.” And in fact it does seem they did:

OSP accounted for 47–60% of all sweet potatoes consumed in the … [study] groups across ages, indicating a moderately high degree of substitution for other varieties. In the control groups, 20–24% of all sweet potatoes consumed were OSP.

Again, paralleling the vitamin A story, this is replacement in the diet, not necessarily substitution in the fields. But it is an alarm bell nonetheless to a conservationist. Genesys shows a worrying situation for sweet potato conservation in Africa, though that’s because it does not yet pick up some very significant national and regional collections, including Mozambique’s own. Hopefully that will change. But as we’ve mentioned here before, it is important for such projects to survey the local diversity before they introduce their own new, no doubt “better” diversity, and make sure the local stuff is placed in genebanks, if it is not there already. I don’t know if that was done in this case. I hope so. Those “currently grown white or yellow sweet potato varieties” may not be much good for vitamin A intake this year in Mozambique, but they may well be very good for something else, next year, somewhere else. And maybe even in the very farms in which they have been replaced.

“Super broccoli” from field to fork

The story begins in the Mediterranean in the early 1980s when Professor Richard Mithen, currently at IFR, was on a field trip to collect rare plants as part of his PhD at the University of East Anglia. “We collected wild brassicas in southern Italy and Sicily, and that material was sent into various seed banks in Italy, Sweden and Spain,” says Mithen. “I was able to go on this expedition due to Professor Harold Woolhouse, the then Director of the John Innes Institute, who provided me with a small grant to cover some of my travel costs.”

If you want to read about this collecting trip, you can, thanks to the Collecting Missions Repository: look for CN375. Here’s the material the boys collected which ended up in Spain, according to an “advanced” Eurisco search, as mapped by Genesys:

Where does the story end, you ask? Well, with Beneforté ‘super broccoli’. And a fascinating story it is too. Read for yourself.

LATER: Prof. Mithen informs me the wild species involved was Brassica villosa.

Rounding up wild Guatemalan cacao accessions

…are there really no wild Guatemalan cacao accessions conserved in genebanks around the world?

I asked the question, so I better have a go at answering it, I suppose.

WIEWS shows no wild cacao from Guatemala, and actually not all that much cacao in Guatemala of any kind. GRIN returns 10 Theobroma accessions from Guatemala, but none of them are described as wild. The International Cocoa Germplasm Database (ICGD) returns 6 accessions from 4 localities. Here they are shown as crosses.

I got them into Google Earth via DIVA-GIS. The other icons show the distribution of herbarium specimens of wild T. cacao (C) and T. bicolor (B) and the predicted range of the former, according to the Guatemalan CWR atlas I blogged about yesterday. But you can’t tell from the data in ICGD whether the accessions represented by crosses are wild or not. Don’t worry though, there’s a reference given for all the accessions, so all is not lost: Rivera De Leon, S. (1986). Informe general sobre el proyecto de recoleccion de cacao Criollo en Guatemala. Unpublished report AGPG:IBPGR (FAO Rome)/86/156. Estacion de Fomento Los Brillantes, Guatemala.

It is an IBPGR report, so it should be available in the Bioversity’s Collecting Missions Files Repository. Which it is, although finding it was non-trivial. I’m not sure if that last link is going to last long, so look for collecting mission CN234. The problem is, I can see no way of attaching the description of the material given in the report to one or another of the accessions in ICGD. So although it does look from the report as though some of the material collected in 1986 may have been wild, I can’t tell you which if any of those crosses in the map above could legitimately be added to the Atlas of Guatemalan Crop Wild Relatives.

So the answer to the question I started out with is: I don’t know. I suppose it’ll take an expert in the crop to sort it out. You come up against this again and again in Genebank Database Hell. You can get so far, but to get any further you need human intervention.

Some faba beans, without the nice Chianti

ResearchBlogging.orgIf you’re a faba bean breeder interested in cold tolerance you will have come across a paper recently in GRACE the title of which will have set your pulse racing: Screening and selection of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) for cold tolerance and comparison to wild relatives. 1 And if you had skimmed ahead to the conclusion you would have found it difficult to contain your excitement.

In conclusion, some faba bean accessions were selected for cold tolerance and desirable agronomic characteristics. ACV-42, ACV-84 and ACV-88 were selected as highly cold tolerant. These sources of cold tolerance could be used to improve cold tolerance level in faba bean breeding programs.

You would then have gone back and read the paper thoroughly to find more information on these previous accessions, and in particular on where to get hold of them. But you would have been disappointed, and you might very well have moved dejectedly onto the next paper in your Google alert.

Fortunately I am made of sterner stuff. So, thanks to an email to the authors, I can now tell you that

ACV-42 = TR 31590 at the Aegean Agricultural Research Institute, Izmir, Turkey
ACV-84 = IG 14048 at ICARDA
ACV-88 = IG 72247 also at ICARDA

And, thanks to Genesys, I can add that IG 14048 is a Polish landrace called Debek and IG 72247 is from Canada and has at some point had the number “73 Rm 70”, though I can find no reference to this in GRIN-Canada. Neither Eurisco nor Genesys has the Turkish genebank’s faba bean data, and their website was down when I tried it today, so I can’t tell you anything about TR 31590, I’m afraid.

You’re welcome.

And here’s a bit of a bonus for you. The paper also drops the fact that

The best known freezing tolerant genotype is a French genotype ‘Cote d’Or’ which can survive –22ºC if previously hardened…

Well, being a faba bean breeder interested in cold tolerance you probably already know that, and have it, but in case you’ve run out or something, Genesys/Eurisco says you can get it in a couple of different genebanks, including CGN in the Netherlands. 2

Now, to feed back that evaluation information on ACV 42, 84 and 88 — and indeed all the other hundred-odd accessions evaluated in the paper — to the genebanks from whence they came, to make life that little bit easier for the next faba bean breeder interested in cold tolerance breeder…

CGIAR research on Cassava Brown Streak Disease

Catherine Njuguna, a communications specialist at IITA, left a lengthy comment explaining all the work being done to combat cassava brown streak disease. We asked if we could use it as a guest post. She sent this even longer article, which we’re happy to share.

Efforts to save Africa’s cassava from deadly viral diseases

The warning by Food and Agriculture Organization on the viral disease wreaking havoc cassava, an important staple in eastern and central Africa, was spot on and timely. It highlights the challenges posed by this new and not-so new disease, Cassava Brown Streak Disease, which is threatening the food security and livelihoods of over 200 million people who depend on the crop.

Together, the two diseases cause more than 1 billion USD worth of damage to Africa’s cassava. The already poor small-scale farmers bear the brunt of this loss.

On a positive note, a lot of work is being carried out by various the governments, researchers, donors, Non-governmental organizations and the farmers themselves, to combat not only the cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) but also cassava mosaic disease – another disease drastically affecting cassava in the region to avert the looming catastrophe. However, a, lot more still needs to be done as the two diseases continue to spread rapidly through the region.

Some of the activities we are carrying out at IITA in collaboration with our wide range of partners from other Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) centres, National Agricultural Research Systems, (NARS), Universities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), Community Based Organizations and Private sector include:

  • Breeding for varieties that are tolerant/ resistant to both the Cassava Brown Streak Disease (CBSD) and the Cassava Mosaic disease (CMD) using conventional and molecular assisted breeding: Efforts are under way to develop high yielding varieties resistant to the two diseases. While we have not had any success in CBSD resistant varieties, we have identified and are promoting varieties that are tolerant to the diseases – they show symptoms but still give acceptable yields.

In Zanzibar, the cassava production has been revived by four tolerant varieties developed together with Zanzibar researchers at Kizimbani research institute officially released in 2007. On mainland Tanzania working with researchers from the Ministry of Agriculture, Food Security and Cooperatives, 8 improved varieties for the Lake Zone region and 5 varieties for mid-altitude areas in tolerant to Cassava Mosaic Disease were officially released in 2009. They are also showing acceptable levels of tolerance to CBSD. IITA and partners including FAO, CRS are working to rapidly multiply and get to farmers clean planting material of these tolerant varieties. A further 8 varieties showing tolerance to both diseases for coastal lowlands are at an advanced trial phase.

Farmers in Ukerewe take part in participatory variety selection to help ensure new varieties meet their preferences

Breeding efforts are also underway in Uganda where varieties, crossed with tolerant varieties from Tanzania and showing acceptable levels of tolerance to the diseases under the harshest of disease pressure conditions are in the pipeline for release in a year or two after further testing.

Scientists are also using advanced technologies such as molecular marker-based breeding (MAB) for faster and more effective breeding of resistant cassava as conventional breeding takes between eight to twelve years to come up with the improved varieties.

However, as a vegetatively propagated plant, getting enough planting materials to meet the demand is a tremendous challenge. A lot of support is needed to devise rapid and efficient ways of getting healthy planting material of improved cassava varieties to needy farming communities as rapidly and efficiently as possible.

  • Understand disease epidemiology – Although cassava brown streak had been known in East Africa for many years, it had always been confined to lowland coastal areas. The new outbreaks defied existing research wisdom as rapid new spread was reported from the relatively high altitude regions (over 3000 feet above sea level) of Uganda, Kenya, and Tanzania around the shores of Lake Victoria. Research efforts are under way to understand what is driving this new spread. A lot of knowledge has now been generated on the virus (CBSV), developing diagnostic tools and basic technologies to manage the disease. However, a lot of research is still needed as the virus is very diverse.
  • Surveillance systems to track the spread of the diseases: Under the Great Lakes Cassava Initiative (GLCI) funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, a regional surveillance program was set up in 2009. It was made up of national agricultural research systems of Burundi, DRC, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda, IITA, Catholic Relief Services (CRS) and the UK’s Food and Environment Research Agency (FERA) among others to track the extent and speed of spread of CBSD and CMD in the five countries. This will assist in detecting when the disease spreads to new areas and help to identify areas of priority.
  • Whitefly vector: A lot of research is underway to understand the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci – the tiny insects transmit the viruses that cause the CMD and CBSD- how it spreads the disease and the relationship between it and the disease. Research is also underway to find a biological control to sustainably reduce its population.

Overview of IITA work on combating CBSD.

A brief of the two diseases

CBSD was first reported from Amani, Tanzania in 1936 but was mostly confined to the low lands of Eastern Africa and around Lake Malawi. However, from 2004, the disease, which causes a dry rot in the roots rendering them inedible, started spreading to mid-altitude areas and has drastically affected cassava production in Central and South-Western Uganda, North Western Tanzania, Western Kenya, and North Western DR Congo.

The disease damages the most economically important part of the crop, the roots. Furthermore, the symptoms are not always clear. A field of cassava looking healthy and vigorous up to the time of harvest can conceal the grim reality of rotten useless roots, revealed as the farmer digs up her long-anticipated crop.

CMD, on the other hand, also has a long history in Africa and was first reported in 1894 and the earliest management work initiated in 1930s in Tanganyika. However, an unusually severe form was first reported in Uganda in the late 1980s. The country experienced a severe epidemic that reduced national cassava yields by a third within three to four years severely affecting the food security. Efforts to develop disease resistant varieties were successful. CMD resistant varieties were developed, clean planting materials widely distributed and education in sound agronomic practices. By the early 2000s, major increases in cassava production were being realized in many affected countries, as resistant varieties spread. Many farmers who had stopped growing the crop in despair started growing it again. The work of disseminating the new varieties to farmers was supported through large-scale campaigns to raise awareness about the disease, its symptoms and measures to stop its spread

However, the emergence of CBSD has become an additional challenge for breeders and researchers to grapple with as crops that were developed and resistant to Cassava Mosaic disease were susceptible to the new disease.