Meat, glorious meat

We spent the Easter holidays in Colmurano again, and, like last summer, it was a wonderfully bucolic experience. One of the highlights was definitely a visit to the Macelleria Giuseppe dell’Orso in nearby Loro Piceno. Giuseppe, otherwise known as Beppe Cotto, is an artist with meat. And a bit of a showman as well. He welcomes every customer with some vino cotto and a slice of the local salame.

img_4718

He’s fond — ok, perhaps overly fond — of bursting into song or poetry at the thought of some of his products, all based on local produce and traditions. His salsicce al vino cotto are fantastic. Also his pâté, which includes cacao somewhere in the production process. It is great to see a young man making a living — and a name for himself — at a local agrobiodiversity-based trade, and really enjoying himself to boot.

img_4719

Featured: Maps

Meike, on GMO introgression “risk” mapped:

We have not only uploaded the maps … but also the raw data that we have used for mapping the distributions of the crop wild relatives (as grid, Google Earth kml, and excel files). So before searching GBIF, SINGER and other online databases: you might save yourself some (a lot!) time if you have a look here first, because we have already done this for most of the wild relatives of 20 different crops!

Asian cattle

Darren Naish at Tetrapod Zoology gives an overview of the cattle of Asia, with pictures. A couple of take home messages, for me. One is that the domestication of various bovids is pretty complex, with hybrids, feral forms, wild relatives and all combinations thereof in existence. The other is this conversation-stopping tidbit: “domestic cattle don’t need to shiver or employ other thermoregulatory tricks even in temperatures approaching -20° C”. Why not? Go read Darren’s post, and then reconsider the “fleshy dewlaps, tall dorsal ridges and other structures” that are typical of tropical types.

Melaku Worede speaks

And this is what the veteran crop conservationist says:

Gene banks like the SADC gene bank, the Svalbard gene bank, and many others, focus only on collecting and preserving. How can you think you are conserving diversity when the very source upon which the seeds depend is not included? You can capture only so much, and in 100 years it will be useless because the planet will have changed. Perhaps you will be able to incorporate some genetic material into varieties and release them, but who is going to benefit from that? That is the big question.

I know what he means. You need to conserve the process, as well as the product. But I have another big question. If the world — read the climate — is changing as fast as many now fear, don’t you need the insurance policy that genebanks provide all the more?