Here’s something contrarian. The Economist says that there’s no shortage of bees in California this year. Far from it, there’s actually a glut. As you might expect, it’s complex:
This year’s Californian bee glut, then, has been caused by a mixture of rising supply meeting falling demand. The price of almonds dropped by 30% between August and December last year, as people had less money in their pockets. That has caused growers to cut costs, and therefore hire fewer hives. There is also a drought in the region, and many farmers are unlikely to receive enough water to go ahead with the harvest. Meanwhile, the recent high prices for pollination contracts made it look worthwhile fattening bees up with supplements over the winter. That may help explain why there have been fewer colony collapses.
The entire article is a useful summary of where things stand on colony collapse disorder, and the clearest conclusion is that almost certainly there is no single cause. A diversity of problems, each exacerbating the others and — what do you know? — a diversity of solutions, each of which seems to improve matters a little.
(I’d like to add that the headline and crossheads of that article are among the best I’ve seen all year: The bees are back in town; Bee good to me; Bee-conomics; Bee off with you. Someone had a lot of fun. And thanks Michael for being so quick off the mark with a tip.)
So, what’s the buzz?
:-)
Oh, very good!
To bee or not too bee: another piece about the bee glut California (they are a pest if you want to grow seedless tangerines).
I’m glad the economists are so optimistic. I’m not sure if the beekeepers who are going out of business every day would feel the same.