Peter Matthews attempts to mediate between agriculture and nature:
I think if the nature-conservation ethic could extend further into agricultural landscapes, then there would be more room to extend the development-ethic into natural landscapes. Lets say 20% for nature, 60% for nature and us, and 20% just for us? What are we aiming for, if we have any aims?
So, let’s all hear it for the Satoyama Initiative and “socio-ecological production landscapes”?