Author: Jeremy Cherfas

Posted on

Those elusive pizzutelli, again

With thanks to Giuseppe for pointing out another fruit painter, I went looking for Bartolomeo Bimbi’s depiction of our current favourite grape, and found a reasonable version. I reckon that’s it fourth from the right in the third row down.

Unfortunately, on the version I found the names of the varieties, which I take to be somewhere within the escutcheon at the bottom of the painting, are illegible. Having looked at all the bunches hanging there, that’s the only one that does seem vaguely horn shaped. The original is in the Villa Medicea in Poggio a Caiano, about 15 km northwest of Florence, and if I’m ever in the area I’ll try and get a better look. Old paintings and manuscripts are clearly a good source of information for modern-day fans of diversity sleuthing, although I confess I rely on others more expert than me to do most of the legwork. A perfect example is Andrea Borracelli, whose website is full of this kind of information (and for which I am grateful).

From him, we learn that Galletta Bianca belongs to the group ‘Pizzutello’ for the characteristic shape of the berries, and was found ((In the sense, I think, of being rediscovered after being lost for some time.)) in the area of Montepulciano, growing in family gardens. It is an old Tuscan variety … described in 1809 by Targioni Tozzetti as having “acini corniculatis flavescentibus” — horn-shaped, yellow berries. Galletta Bianca (there is also a black form), differs from the known Pizzutello white, ((Alas, Borracelli does not say exactly how it differs.)) is listed in the Catalogue of Betti (1851) ((Betti P. 1851. Catalogo degli alberi fruttiferi e delle uve succulenti, coltivate nei pomari di Barbacane presso Firenze. Atti dell’Accademia dei Georgofili, which I found details of here.)) and in the catalogue for the Public Exhibition of the Horticultural Society of Tuscany (1858). Low (1982) lists Uva Cornelia as a synonym for Galletta Bianca. Vine of medium vigour, with normal (?) productivity, limited to the provinces of Siena and Arezzo. It has an average percentage of fruit set, with the first fruiting shoot on the third or fourth bud, with two inflorescences per shoot, and has a normal tolerance to the most common parasitic diseases.

And I reckon that’s about all the sleuthing we’re going to do, unless, of course, something even more interesting turns up.

Just for comparison, here are a couple of my own pictures of pizzutello bought just up the road a little more than a month ago.

Bimbi, by the way, clearly had a great interest in diversity; he also painted a two-headed lamb for Grand Duke Cosimo III de’ Medici.

Posted on

Featured: A history of synthetic rape

In pointing out that the resynthesis of oilseed rape goes back a little further than I originally thought, Toby Hodgkin offers a little more background on the whole story.

A general point is the importance of pre-breeding as part of the overall crop improvement process. It’s also worth commenting that the idea of resynthesis and hybrid transfers of useful genes in Brassicas was part of the breeding process at Scottish Plant Breeding Station, SCRI and in a number of European and American groups from the late 1960s on. There was quite a lot of interesting work on the relative merits of crossing at different ploidy levels, on the tissue culture processes to use and on the consequences of making the crosses in different directions and the results from subsequent backcrosses.

I hear that there is currently an interest in biofuel rapeseed. In this case the nasty biochemicals wouldn’t matter much while heterosis might be the real interest. Almost back to the start of the resurgence of rapeseed in the second world war in Canada – as a source of high quality (high erucic) oil for aeroplanes.

Who is capturing these memories?

Posted on

Who knows what about cassava brown streak disease

We asked why the CGIAR has apparently been so silent on Cassava Brown Streak Disease. Glenn pointed out that maybe we’re just ignorant.

There is probably more going on, we just don’t know about it. One key question is whether genebanks have been thoroughly screened for CBSD resistence.

Well, have they?

Glenn makes another good point.

In theory, CG reform should be able to tackle a problem like this more efficiently. The roots and tuber program should be promoting more interaction between IITA and CIAT, interaction that would bring together the researchers mostly closely working on CBSD with others that might have solutions … maybe someone who know more about this can comment.

Well, can they?

But caught up in the frenzy, Glenn cannot help but post a little something on CBSD himself, thus finally breaking that CGIAR silence. Our next question? Why doesn’t FARM-Africa mention the disease in their post, also today, on their cassava work in Western Kenya? The disease is just across the border in Tanzania, after all, according to Glenn’s maps.

Posted on

Nibbles: New cassava, CBSD maps, Research, Pest management, Banana research

Posted on

Broadening the base for oilseed rape

Groceryphoto v2

Cabbages are the dogs of the crop world, trotted out whenever a point about diversity needs to be made. ((Photo by Paul Williams, found here.)) Brussels sprouts, Siberian kale, kohl rabi and good old boring Savoys are all members of a single species, Brassica oleracea, just as chihuahuas and great Danes are all Canis familiaris. If anything, though, brassicas are more complicated, because different species also interbreed moderately freely, much more so than the occasional doggie-style hybrid. One of the products of that promiscuity is the species known as oilseed rape, B. napus. Cabbage and turnip (B. rapa) apparently did their thing spontaneously “some centuries ago”. But they did so only a few times, and as a result the genetic diversity of oilseed rape is rather limited, depending as it does on the diversity present in those few original crosses between cabbage and turnip.

ResearchBlogging.org An obvious solution (obvious to plant breeders at any rate) is to reproduce those original crosses and resynthesize oilseed rape by arranging crosses between a more diverse bunch of cabbages and turnips, and indeed that is now old hat. Various programmes since the 1990s have created scores of “new” varieties of oilseed rape. The problem is that many of these have all the drawbacks of old oilseed rape, before the seeds were cleaned up of their nasty biochemicals and sanitized as canola. Merely crossing resynthesized oilseed with existing varieties in the hope of getting some of the better qualities of the new varieties into the improved cultivars is thus fraught with the risk of introducing bad stuff as well. The answer is backcrossing, breeding the offspring lines with their parents while selecting for the good qualities and against the bad qualities. As the authors of a new paper ((Girke, A., Schierholt, A., & Becker, H. (2011). Extending the rapeseed genepool with resynthesized Brassica napus L. I: Genetic diversity Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution DOI: 10.1007/s10722-011-9772-8)) note, this is

“a labor intensive approach and a long-term perspective, and appropriate resynthesized lines would have to be selected carefully.”

If you’re going to get into that, you may as well choose the parents for your breeding programme to be as different as possible from what you already have, to maximise the chances of finding something good and useful. Which is what the paper is all about. Andreas Girke and his colleagues measured the genetic distances within three distinct groups of oilseed rape and a collection of resynthesized varieties. They found, more or less as expected, that the spring, winter and Asian oilseed rapes were more similar to one another while the synthetic rapes were more diverse. Furthermore, and reassuringly, while the three groups tended to cluster as groups in a more detailed analyses of their DNA diversity, the synthetic rapes were roughly equally spread among the three clusters. The detailed analyses will give brassica breeders some of the information they need to breed better oilseed varieties. But a crucial question remains unanswered. How do offspring of the synthetic rapes crossed with established varieties perform in the field? The researchers crossed 44 synthetic rapes with two cultivars and planted out the offspring to measure how well they do and whether there is any relationship between the genetic distance between the two parents and performance in the field. But don’t get too excited; “The result of these studies will be presented in a separate publication.”

P.S. Many of the crops on which humanity depends are genetically interesting inter-specific hybrids, and re-doing the original, accidental crosses not only throws light on their evolution but also is of practical value to breeders. The whole business of resynthesized lines, which as far as I know began with CIMMYT’s synthetic wheat lines, is little known outside the esoteric world of plant breeding. It would be great to have a readable survey of the field, but I have not been able to find one. Anyone know of anything? And has resynthesis even been attempted for the banana? Answers, please.