- GIS used to manage production and marketing of honey.
- Silly season story number 1 and number 2.
- Avian flu threatens Turkey’s Hacıkadın chickens.
- Lybia has truffles? From the new NWFP-Newsletter1.
Nibbles: Ag origins, MSV origins, Land origins, Art,
- Podcast on the origins, history and future of agriculture. “Three annual grasses explain history.” “Wheat domesticated humans.” Etc. Richard Manning gives good value.
- The origin of Maize Streak Virus explored.
- Changes in Dutch agricultural land. More diversity in land use over time.
- More ag art. Via.
Tasteful breeding
A couple of days ago the Evil Fruit Lord complained — a little bit — about an article in a Ugandan newspaper which extolled the virtues of traditional crops and varieties over new-fangled hybrids. While not doubting the many attractive qualities of landraces and heirloom varieties, he quite rightly pointed out that there’s nothing to stop modern varieties and hybrids tasting just as good:
I get really sick of the tendency to talk about plant breeding as a process which makes crops into finicky, crappy tasting garbage in exchange for yield. You absolutely can create varieties which taste as good (or better) than traditional varieties, produce more, and resist pests. In fact, plant breeding is the only way to get to that.
Now there’s an article by Arthur Allen in Smithsonian magazine which basically says — not very surprisingly, I suppose — that both those things have happened in the tomato:
Flavor … has not been a goal of most breeding programs. While importing traits like disease resistance, smaller locules, firmness and thicker fruit into the tomato genome, breeders undoubtedly removed genes influencing taste. In the past, many leading tomato breeders were indifferent to this fact. Today, things are different. Many farmers, responding to consumer demand, are delving into the tomato’s preindustrial past to find the flavors of yesteryear.
Allen has a good word to say for the wild relatives:
The architect of the modern commercial tomato was Charles Rick, a University of California geneticist. In the early 1940s, Rick, studying the tomato’s 12 chromosomes, made it a model for plant genetics. He also reached back into the fruit’s past, making more than a dozen bioprospecting trips to Latin America to recover living wild relatives. There is scarcely a commercially produced tomato that didn’t benefit from Rick’s discoveries. The gene that makes such tomatoes easily fall off the vine, for instance, came from Solanum cheesmaniae, a species that Rick brought back from the Galapagos Islands. Resistances to worms, wilts and viruses were also found in Rick’s menagerie of wild tomatoes.
And he also plugs genebanks:
…we can take comfort in the tomato’s continuing, explosive diversity: the U.S. Department of Agriculture has a library of 5,000 seed varieties, and heirloom and hybrid seed producers promote thousands more varieties in their catalogs.
Not quite sure where he got that number, as the C.M. Rick Tomato Genetic Resources Center seems to have about 3,500 accessions, but anyway.
Special publication on livestock genetic resources
Livestock Science has a special issue on animal genetic resources. Or it will have, it doesn’t seem to be out yet, although some corrected proofs are available. You can get a flavour of the thing with the introduction. Here are some of the highlights:
- Animal genetic resource trade flows: Economic assessment
- Genebank development for the conservation of livestock genetic resources in the United States of America
- Molecular characterization of breeds and its use in conservation
- Animal genetic resource trade flows: The utilization of newly imported breeds and the gene flow of imported animals in the United States of America
- Research opportunities in the field of animal genetic resources
- Present status of the conservation of livestock genetic resources in Brazil
- Saving threatened native breeds by autonomous production, involvement of farmers organization, research and policy makers: The case of the Sicilo-Sarde breed in Tunisia, North Africa
More on the Grand Canyon’s super-sunflower
Here’s some more information on that sunflower from Supai that I blogged about yesterday. There was a huge storm last night and I was stuck indoors with not much to do, so I tried to see if I could track down the accessions in question. They’re not for sale from Native Seed/SEARCH, though they are surely in their seed bank. So I went to GRIN, guessing that duplicates of the material had probably been deposited in the USDA system.
A quick text search on “Helianthus Supai” in GRIN’s “Accession area queries” page yielded 5 PI numbers. However, only 4 are “active.” It seems there may not be enough seed available for the fifth. Incidentally, there are also accessions of maize, devil’s horn and Cercis occidentalis from this site.
Now, I could click on each of the sunflower entries and look at the available evaluation data under “Observations” to track down the specific accession with rust resistance, but there is also another way. You can go to GRIN’s “Evaluation/characterization query” page, select sunflower, go to the descriptor list, and find the specific descriptors concerning rust resistance, one of which happens to have the code RUSTNUM3. 2
It turns out that of about 1000 sunflower accessions in the US National Plant Germplasm System for which there are rust data (out of a total of over 2500), only 8 have a RUSTNUM3 value of 100, meaning they are resistant to the fungus. And PI432512, collected by Gary Nabham in 1978 from Supai, is one of them.