Documenting geographical origins of Indian products

Ever realised that the famous, red hot Naga Mirchi (a special variety of chilli from Nagaland) doesn’t have a Wikipedia page?

Well, no, as it happens, but in any case that’s apparently about to change. According to an article in The Hindu, there’s something called an edit-a-thon going on right now that will provide wikipedia pages for Indian products which have been registered for geographical indication (GI). Quite a few other agricultural products are slated for inclusion apart from that notorious Nagaland pepper. Navara rice from Kerala caught my eye. There’s a specimen at IRRI labelled with that name. Also Bhalia wheat from Gujarat. Which unfortunately, in contrast to Navara rice, Genesys drew a blank on. An earlier article in The Hindu gives an alternative appellation, Daudkhani. That name is associated with an accession in the CIMMYT genebank. But that’s from Pakistan.

Nibbles: Value edition

Brainfood: Lima bean cyanide, Hybrid powdery mildew, Amaranth core, Cotton core, Tibetan sheep, Water buffalo history

Featured: Grasspea

There’s a lively conversation about grasspea going on.

With a better understanding of the population genetics of grasspea toxin metabolism in combination with adequate supplies of dietary sulfur amino acids, low toxin varieties may become obsolete as a breeding objective, so that breeders can focus more on yield.

Do join in.

Ban or breed?

I’m not sure I was aware of the fact that grasspea (khesari dal, or Lathyrus sativus) was actually banned in parts of India due to its toxicity. Devinder Sharma, a food and trade policy analyst, thinks the ban should not be lifted, International Year of Pulses notwithstanding. Instead, alternative crops should be promoted, such as pigeonpea (arhar, or Cajanus cajan). It’s interesting that there’s no Indian grasspea in the genebanks that Genesys knows about (red), 1 in stark comparison to pigeonpea (blue).

dal

Lathyrism is a problem in situations where grasspea is pretty much the only thing you have to eat. In former times, when famines were more frequent, the ban probably made sense. But is this still the case? And in any case there’s also lots of research going on low-neurotoxin varieties. A ban is hardly likely to provide much of an incentive for such breeding work.