Evaluating germplasm comes of age

Germplasm evaluation: yeah, sure, you can do it old-school style.

It was ascertained whether the collection of cucumber varieties of our Institute contained any non-bitter plants. At first no rapid chemical method was available for distinguishing the non-bitter plants from the bitter ones. Therefore tasting them was the only usable method. Although a large number of plants can be rapidly tasted, there are some drawbacks.

I bet there are.

A relatively small number of people working at our Institute was found to be capable of picking out correctly the plants that were non-bitter. As a rule a good taster cannot treat more than 20 to 30 plants at a time. The taster has to correct his taste now and then by consuming for instance a piece of toast or apple.

But our intrepid cucumber breeders persevered, and were suitably, if belatedly, rewarded (italics added).

When grown on in a glasshouse the vegetative parts of all plants but one were not entirely free from bitter principle. Although under our conditions none of these plants produced bitter fruits, all the plants that had traces of bitter principles in their vegetative parts were removed. At the end of the growing season only one out of the 15,000 plants tested remained.

But that was in the 1950s. And that’s a foreign country. This is how breeders roll these days:

Cucurbitacins are triterpenoids that confer a bitter taste in cucurbits such as cucumber, melon, watermelon, squash, and pumpkin. These compounds discourage most pests on the plant and have also been shown to have antitumor properties. With genomics and biochemistry, we identified nine cucumber genes in the pathway for biosynthesis of cucurbitacin C and elucidated four catalytic steps. We discovered transcription factors Bl (Bitter leaf) and Bt (Bitter fruit) that regulate this pathway in leaves and fruits, respectively. Traces in genomic signatures indicated that selection imposed on Bt during domestication led to derivation of nonbitter cucurbits from their bitter ancestors.

Which is cool, don’t get me wrong. But somehow seems to take the romance — and fun — out of it.

Incidentally, that one nice-tasting cucumber was an Improved Long Green.

Brainfood: Daniel Zohary, Blue dates, Crop diversification, Tunisian oases, Cranberry diversity, Drought breeding, Seed-use watermelon, Cattle history, Apple conservation

Super bananas in the dock

The Gates Foundation has sunk $15 million into developing GMO ‘super bananas’ with high levels of pre-Vitamin A, writes Adam Breasley. But the project is using ‘stolen’ genes from a Micronesian banana cultivar. And what exactly is the point, when delicious, popular, nutritious ‘red bananas’ rich in caroteinoids are already grown around the tropics?

That provocative lede to an article in The Ecologist provoked a number of responses when I posted it on Facebook ((The link to the banana accession in question I’ve added myself, and for the record, I really cannot see how you can call its use biopiracy)). As not everyone can post comments there, and nobody at all can post comments at The Ecologist, I’ve decided to move the whole thing here.

A couple of comments were actually questions. Anastasia Bodnar asked: Are the existing red banana cultivars suitable for growing where this new variety is intended to be grown? And Sarah Hearne added: And do the red bananas have the same farmer/consumer acceptance in East African and beyond as existing varieties? Good questions all. And Alexandra Zum Felde addressed them, and more, in her comment:

Red bananas — at least ones like those in the photo, not Fe’i bananas — can and are grown where Cavendish are grown (so basically all over the tropics), though they — like many traditional cultivars — are not as productive as Cavendish bananas. But Cavendish are not the issues here — in Uganda the staple banana is Matooke (East African Highland Banana), of which over 180 cultivars exists … and all of which are pretty beta-carotene poor … but local leafy vegetables are full of (pro)vitamins! It would be easier and more cost-effective to re-vamp the image and attractiveness of traditional foods, than to introduce one single GMO variety.

So, are red bananas, whether traditional cultivars or the ones genetically engineered in an Australian lab, the wrong answer to the right question? Discuss.

Nibbles: R&D, Cheese double, Cali candied yams, Sustainable joe, Soy & deforestation, Cereals in Sudan, Big Ag, History of breeding

Nibbles: Hunger Games, Nutritious markets, Plant secrets, Nutrition soundbites, Buckwheat panic, Olive oil panic, Cannabis breeding, Wild turkey genetics, Quinoa wars, Domestication infographics, Howard-Yana Shapiro