- Crop wild relatives from genebank in use shock.
- Landraces from same genebank in use shock. Hopefully a full blog post is coming soon from the author himself.
- Would you eat this cucumber?
- Dog evolution, again.
- New wild cassava species found.
- Thank goodness for our name-based bioinformatics infrastructure, eh?
- The history of benefit sharing deconstructed. Nothing on ITPGRFA?
- Mexican chili farmers maintain rather than direct with their seed selection.
- My genebank is bigger than your genebank!
Mashing up banana wild relatives
Over at the Vaviblog is a detailed discussion (though not nearly as detailed as the paper) of a new paper outlining a new theory for the origin of the cultivated banana. 1
Edible bananas have very few seeds. Wild bananas are packed with seeds; there’s almost nothing there to eat. So how did edible bananas come to be cultivated? The standard story is that some smart proto-farmer saw a spontaneous mutation and then propagated it vegetatively. Once the plant was growing, additional mutants would also be seen and conserved. In fact this “single-step domestication” is considered the standard story for many vegetatively-propagated plants, such as potato, cassava, sweet potato, taro and yam. And while it may be true for those other crops, evidence is accumulating that it may not be the whole story for bananas.
Leaving the details aside, De Langhe and his colleagues propose that instead of a single step, at least two were involved, with a proto-cultivated banana back-crossing with one of its wild relatives and then being seen by the proto-farmer as an improvement to be added to her proto-portfolio of agricultural biodiversity. Something very like that is going on today among cassava farmers, for example; they allow volunteer seedlings, the product of sexual reproduction between already favoured clones and wild relatives, to flourish in their fields and then select among them. 2 Banana farmers could easily have done the same.
To quote again from The Vaviblog:
The big question, of course, is “what does any of this matter?”. And the surprise is that it really does. Banana breeding is difficult at the best of times; no seeds, no pollen, you can imagine. But if the backcross hypothesis is true, then the current approach to banana breeding, which De Langhe et al. describe as “substituting an A genome allele by an alternative derived from a AA diploid source of resistance or tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress”, might be misguided. If the chromosomes are not “pure” A or B, and if backcrosses were involved in the origin of banana varieties, maybe breeders should look again at some of the diploid offspring from their crosses and see whether they could be further backcrossed to come up with types that are more use to farmers.
Now, what I really need is for one of the handful of people who really understand this stuff to tell me where I’ve misunderstood it.
Nibbles: Amazon agriculture, Livestock conservation, Chestnut redux, COP 10, Stone Age flour
- More on that thing about how the Amazon was once pullulating with people. And why.
- Why conserve livestock genetic resources. And one possible way to do it.
- The American people are bringing back the American chestnut.
- COP-watchers, something to amuse yourselves with if things get dull.
- Even Neanderthals understood the benefits of a diverse diet. Though not, perhaps, of jewellery.
Nibbles: Grapes, Pakistan, Passiflora, Coconut, Assisted migration, Small is beautiful
- Illinois grape breeders turn to wild relatives. Wait, what?
- “Floods wash away Pakistan’s crop research efforts.” And everything else.
- Passion fruits run riot in Lessos, Kenya.
- CIAT experts aim to ease Colombia’s coconut disease squeeze.
- Botanists agonize over assisted migration.
- Gates Foundation puts stop to debate on smallholder productivity.
Nibbles: Pigeonpea, Livestock breeding, Ecotourism, Data
- Pigeonpea gets the genomics treatment.
- Animal genetic resources for the poor: “…one of the highest priority interventions for the smallholder systems is the development of innovative approaches for the strategic use of appropriate genotypes from the available range of global breed resources.”
- How good is ecotourism?
- Gapminder does per capita food supply.