Brainfood: Brassica rethink, Camel colours, Parsing the ITPGRFA, Static buffalo, Traits not taxa, Expert tyranny, Chinese pollinators, Heritage landscapes, Mining text, Diversity & nutrition

Nibbles: Kinky crops, Hot pepper, Cary Fowler, Gin history, Open data, Quaker food, QPM in Ethiopia, Botany app, Old seeds, New tomato

  • Why aren’t there more crops among the orchids?
  • This pepper is not so much a crop as a weapon of mass destruction.
  • Now here’s a crop. New tomato has taste, storability, looks. But I think it’s dating.
  • Maize with cool amino acids reaches Ethiopia. Must have walked there.
  • Really old squash seeds.
  • Cary Fowler on the Weather Channel. You heard me.
  • Quakers have an opinion on the right to food and climate change. Well, why shouldn’t they? They also have a UN office, but that’s another story. No word on whether they made the Weather Channel.
  • Ok, so apparently the answer is data. Says a data company. And open data at that. Quakers nonplussed.
  • Botanizing in N or S America? There’s an app for that.
  • The rise and rise of gin. And I certainly need one.

Brainfood: Vavilov then & now & always, Helmeted fowl diversity, MLND resistance, Sorghum diversity, Facilitation, Rice yields, Biodiversity services, Wild tomato diversity, Date diversity

Nibbles: WEMA, AGRA, African universities, Taining breeders, Millets @ICRISAT

  • CIMMYT pushes its newly-bred water-efficient maize in Africa.
  • AGRA not mentioned in the above but surely they were involved? If only in the extension part.
  • African universities also not mentioned, but probably less likely to have been involved. Alas.
  • Register for the next class of the European Plant Breeding Academy, which starts in October 2015. Not at an African university. At a US university.
  • ICRISAT pivots towards millets. Will probably involve breeding. And maybe universities.
  • As for genebanks, I’ve given up expecting namechecks in any of the above.

Genebanks and farmers

As they cooperate with seed companies, the gene banks do not feel responsible for distribution of seeds to their prime users, the peasants. Thus, the peasant is not taken as a stakeholder of the plant breeding and the seed conservation and production. But, as the choice of seeds influences the type of agriculture, of landscape, of environment and of food, it is hypocritical not letting this choice, this right to the peasants. It is essential to put the peasants in the heart of seed conservation and to esteem the social role of seeds: they allow people to produce food, to share knowledge and traditions, and to be independent from any corporate dependence.

That’s according to Lena Haun, Agrobiodiversity Campaigner Intern at Eco Ruralis, after talking to genebanks in France and Romania. But with all due respect, I find it very hard to believe the premise that “gene banks do not feel responsible for distribution of seeds to their prime users, the peasants.” Want an example? Here’s Dave Ellis from the genebank of the International Potato Center:

For example, we found in our collection potato cultivars that were collected in the last 30 to 40 years in Peru’s Sacred Valley, and gave those varieties back to the communities that live in the Parque de la Papa, close to Cusco. Now they are growing and testing them again. This is really important, as the Sacred Valley is one place in the world where we have documented evidence of the need for flexibility in potato cultivation due to a rapidly changing climate.

I think Dave feels responsible for distribution of potato diversity from the CIP genebank to its prime users, the peasants. Don’t you? So do the partners involved in Bioversity’s Seeds for Needs initiative, 1 for example. And every national genebank manager I’ve ever spoken to, for that matter.

Sure, genebanks collaborate with seed companies. And what’s wrong with that, if farmers end up with more, better choices? Anyway, they also collaborate with public sector plant breeders. And work directly with farmers in many, many cases. They could probably do it more. But to say that genebanks don’t feel a responsibility for making the diversity they maintain available to farming communities is just plain wrong.