No answers: we just don’t know. But Bruce Smith, whose book on The Emergence of Agriculture remains one of the best, recently told an audience at Harvard University that although most people see domestication as “a before-and-after kind of event, with hunter-gatherers before and farmers afterward. The reality … was likely far more complex.”
Hard to argue with that, especially in light of increasing evidence that people were both altering the environment to favour wild food sources and cultivating plants without domesticating them. Smith talked a bit about which plants were domesticated — “early-succession species that did well in disturbed environments that humans could create for them” — but not, at least according to the reports, about whether there’s any scope for additional domestications. We’ve asked before: are there any species that people should be cultivating, and possibly domesticating, now that they have so far ignored? My own contenders would be perennial grains. The plants are there; they just need a few thousands year’s work.
Smith’s lecture was part of a series called Food for Thought. ((Harvard brains hard at work.)) We missed one by my old mucker Richard Wrangham, of How Cooking Made Us Human, but tomorrow, 23 February, Samuel Myers will “discuss troubling trends, including climate change and increased threats from pests and pathogens that may constrain the world’s resources, requiring new approaches to sustainable agriculture.” I wonder whether agricultural biodiversity will feature. Someone go, and tell us.