Featured: Conservation

Brian Ford-Lloyd is moved swiftly to action by Slow Food:

Hold on! Whoever thought those involved in food production could undertake effective conservation of genetic diversity? Slow food enthusiasts are not the only ones to discard the ‘not-so-good’ – the whole of domestication must have been based on it. Hunter gatherers rejected the more spiny/hairy/thick seed coated/bitter tasting/alkoloid containing in favour of those plants with less of those no-so-good features. Plant breeders have traditionally done the same, but who said plant breeders made the best conservationists?

Leaving aside the alkaloids, obviously, one would have to agree. Agriculture grows by selection, and selection requires rejection. But where does Slow Food fit into all this?

Featured: Genebanks

Glenn thinks we ought to formalise the social network needs of breeders, genebank managers et al.

Does this type of discussion occur naturally? Or do we need something to motivate it? … Maybe we should do something about it?

We could write up a project and find somebody to fund it. Maybe it would be a risky project — social networking for crop improvement (genetic resources use) … But would it be any riskier than the current database hell projects?

Good point, well made. Off you go.

Featured: More origins

Dave Wood muses on the successional stage of crop progenitors and the origins of agriculture:

…if early crops were directly derived from massive pure stands of wild relatives, then such crops have an ecological heritage of stability. If so, we can now stop worrying about stability based on diversity in agro-ecosystems and start worrying about just what factors once determined the obvious stability of climax vegetation of crop relatives of our major cereals.

Featured: Origins of Agriculture

Cary waxes lyrical on the origins of agriculture:

We who love diversity and love agricultural history should revel in the complexity of the subject. Smith’s profound and insightful work adds so much. I only wish more of us appreciated it. If more did, imagine how differently we in the genetic resources community might see the world. It would, actually, change the world.