- Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services documents examples of how indigenous people’s knowledge conserves biodiversity, including of the agricultural kind.
- The truth about frankincense and myrrh. Talk about traditional knowledge.
- Can global crop production meet future demands? The Story Map.
- What ICRISAT is doing about the above, from the horse’s mouth.
- Progress in Achieving and Delivering Drought Tolerance in Maize — An Update: “Germplasm collections are assuming greater importance if gains from native genes are to be sustained. Efficient and accurate field phenotyping remains essential for genetic progress.”
- Workshop in Field-based High Throughput Phenotyping. Next April, in Arizona, you maize people.
- A clone is a clone is… no wait.
- Root and tuber people already planning their next big shindig, in October 2015. Meanwhile, they’re getting down to work in the Pacific.
- AoB Blog on plant science on Facebook. Also on Facebook.
- Solanum expert Dr Sandy Knapp on the of Global Plants Initiative.
- Archaeological remains of agriculture found in Nuevo Leon are oldest for that Mexican state.
- Legumes (genera) of the world now online, thanks to Kew.
Brainfood: Gaming landuse decisions, Natura 2000, Expressing pears, Medicinal rice, Agroforestry and conservation, Grasslands, Cotton diversity, Ancient cattle, Neolithic Balkans, Indian guar
- Gaming for smallholder participation in the design of more sustainable agricultural landscapes. Board game can be used to facilitate communal decision-making in landuse planning in the buffer zone of a Man and Biosphere Reserve. What’s not to like?
- Mixed effects of long-term conservation investment in Natura 2000 farmland. It has been good for some things, not so good for others. No word on how CWRs have fared.
- Microarray analysis of gene expression patterns during fruit development in European pear (Pyrus communis). They’re different to those of Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia).
- Quantitative and molecular analyses reveal a deep genetic divergence between the ancient medicinal rice (Oryza sativa) Njavara and syntopic traditional cultivars. Njavara is a cryptic variant of traditional Kerala varieties.
- Relationships between Biodiversity and Biological Control in Agroecosystems: Current Status and Future Challenges. Management should aim to suppress pests while maintaining diversity of natural enemy guilds. Easier said than done, I suspect.
- Agroforestry and Biodiversity Conservation in Tropical Landscapes. Between agroforestry cause and conservation effect are a bunch of pesky assumptions. I wonder if gaming would help.
- Livestock grazing and biodiversity in semi-natural grasslands. It can be good. Just one paper in the proceedings of a recent major conference on grasslands.
- Genetic diversity and population structure in the US Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Who needs wild relatives when you have diverse obsolete varieties?
- Morphological and genetic evidence for early Holocene cattle management in northeastern China. Archaeology and DNA suggest parallel domestication of cattle in China.
- Domesticated Animals and Biodiversity: Early Agriculture at the Gates of Europe and Long-term Ecological Consequences. For thousands of years the impact of agriculture in the Balkans was limited.
- Characterization of released and elite genotypes of guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.] from India proves unrelated to geographical origin. And?
Rice breeding: the history behind the hope behind the hype
Yes, I’m fully aware that you’re fed up with examples of how complex and time-consuming plant breeding is, and how reliant it is on material in genebanks being available in perpetuity. I can hear you saying it from here: “We get it, already; move on.” But it’s my blog, not to mention my job, so here’s another one.
You may have seen news of the identification of a gene in rice that the authors of a recent paper in PNAS think holds promise for significantly increasing yields. I won’t speculate here about whether that hope will be fulfilled, or indeed whether theirs was the best strategy to follow. I just want to illustrate what it took to get to the point of being in a position to thus speculate. Here’s the background, from the introduction section of the PNAS paper: it goes back over 20 years:
In 1989, a breeding program for New Plant Type (NPT) rice was launched at IRRI to increase the yields of modern indica cultivars by using genetic material from tropical japonica landraces. Several Indonesian tropical japonica landraces — which are characterized by large panicles, large leaves, a vigorous root system, thick stems, and few unproductive tillers — have been used in international breeding programs. However, despite these features, the NPT cultivars yield less than modern indica cultivars, mainly because of low grain fertility and low panicle number. To genetically dissect and elicit the valuable traits of NPT cultivars, we backcrossed the NPT cultivars … against modern indica cultivar IR64 to develop introgression lines (ILs) (Fig. S1). BC3-derived ILs, which had favorable yield-related traits and few undesirable traits, were selected by field observation. …a near-isogenic line (NIL)…, derived from tropical japonica landrace Daringan with an IR64 genetic background, had more spikelets per panicle and more branches than IR64.
Here’s what that looks like, from the supplementary materials of the paper (it’s that Fig. S1 mentioned in the snippet quoted above):
That’s a lot of work. Let’s recap. First there are the various plant lines that came out of the NPT project, which in themselves were the result of a lot of work. Then there was the crossing of those to IR64, and various generations of backcrossing (that’s all those BCs) to end up with different plants in which different bits of the tropical japonica genome are embedded into what is mainly the IR64 indica genome. Then one of those bits of tropical japonica genome had to be found to improve IR64. That came from a particular landrace from Indonesia, called Daringan. ((In fact from a cross between that and another variety, but anyway.)) Which, of course, the authors found in the IRRI genebank, though they don’t actually say so, unfortunately. Phew.
Quick digression here into Genebank Database Hell. It turns out that if you look at the relevant databases at IRRI, ((And trust me, we have.)) you can’t in fact prove to 100% certitude that the sample of Daringan used by the breeders in question in this work came from the IRRI genebank. There’s a gap in the chain of data, due to the fact that by and large genebanks and breeders use different documentation systems, or used to. Everybody currently working at the genebank knows that the seeds came from them. Problem is, what happens when they go? They really need to correct the data in their documentation system, which almost uniquely at IRRI now covers both genebank accessions and breeding materials. But who wants to fund correcting data in a database? Anyone who wants to see genebanks serve breeders’ needs effectively and efficiently into the far future, thats who.
Anyway. Ok, so after all that, now the gene has been isolated and it, and it only, has been inserted into one of the newer indica varieties, IRRI 146, with promising results. But wait, it’s not over, because IRRI 146 is itself far from a simple thing. Here is its pedigree, courtesy of IRRI’s database. You can click on it to see it better, if you dare.
So each incremental step in breeding, each of the advances that the press likes to hype as a breakthrough, actually relies on building on all the painstaking genetic reshuffling work that came before, going back decades in many cases, with the occasional infusion of new diversity from genebanks, as in the case of Daringan. We may have this gene now, and I hope it does lead to those hoped-for increases in yield when it finally gets into farmers’ fields, but you know we’re going to need another one soon, and then another one. ((Which, incidentally, leads some to question the premise of the gene-by-gene approach, but that’s another story. And one which also ends with genebanks.)) We always do. And we’re going to get them from seed which is sitting in a genebank. We hope.
Nibbles: Homegardens, Ancient grains, Homeless hens, Data data data, New maize, ICRISAT ambassadors, Wine microbes, India, Soil Day
- Emma Cooper blogs her ethnobotanical MSc dissertation on British homegardeners and their cool crops.
- If she’d done her work in Sweden, she’d have written about Ragnar Pettersson and his “treasure of Ardre.”
- The downside of backyard farming: homeless hens.
- International e-Conference on Germplasm Data Interoperability: Genebank Database Hell gets an e-conference. What could possibly go wrong.
- Apparently there’s a new way to search for agricultural bibliografic (sic) data.
- CIMMYT gets its maize out there.
- ICRISAT is not one to hide its light under a bushel either.
- Aussies to survey their yeasts and bacteria to improve winemaking.
- The problems of India: “It takes a particular brand of incompetence and neglect for decades of stellar growth to have no apparent impact on India’s sky-high levels of under-nutrition.” I bet Dreze and Sen didn’t include a food bubble. Hey, but that can be exported.
- Oh and happy World Soil Day! Thanks to it, and Jim Croft, I now know Australia has a sort of soil genebank.
The Queen’s mulberries
That would be the British Queen. And yes, she has mulberry trees. A collection of them, believe it or not. On the grounds of Buckingham Palace, no less. Thanks to Sophie Leguil for pointing me to the story, which is absolutely fascinating, and which you can read in full on the Official Website of the British Monarchy.
Putting white gloves on to examine the precious book on the Queen's National Collection of Mulberries @Buck_Palace pic.twitter.com/VQPZomyRWv
— Sophie Leguil (@SLeguil) December 3, 2013
Here’s how the story starts, just to whet your appetite:
In 1608 King James I had a Mulberry Garden planted on an area of approximately 17,500 square yards to the north of the present Palace in an attempt to foster the cultivation of silk worms, which had been successful on the continent.
And here’s how it ends:
The collection was awarded provisional National Collection status in October 2002 and granted Full Status in August 2005. Most of the collection is housed at Buckingham Palace whilst a few are held at Kensington Palace and Marlborough House. The mirror collection at the Royal Gardens, Windsor is performing well with good growth all round.
…
The number of taxa planted in the various gardens is now 35, made up of 9 species (inc. subspecies) and 24 cultivars. The new accession this year has been Morus mongolica received from John Fielding. All plants in the collection are currently labelled distinctly with the Plant Heritage logo to identify the individual specimens in the collection.
But really the fun bit is in between, so do read the whole thing. So many questions arise. Do I write to the HM The Queen if I want seeds, or a cutting? Is she the one to sign the MTA? What descriptors does she use, and are the data online? Does Prince Charles insist on organic management of the trees, and on selling the produce at exorbitant prices? And why is her collections not in WIEWS?