Lightning strikes coconuts twice (and more)

I’m still in the Philippines, but I’ve moved from rice to coconuts. That’s in terms of what I’m discussing, not what I’m eating. I’m participating in a meeting of the curators of the five different regional components of the International Coconut Genebank, organized by COGENT. There’s a lot of interesting stuff coming out, but what I wanted to share with you now (it’s actually the afternoon tea break) is something that was shown earlier today ((By Roland Bourdeix of CIRAD.)) to illustrate the problems that conservation of coconuts in field genebanks can face.

The image below comes from Google Earth and shows a small piece of one of the largest and most important coconut genebanks in the world, at the Marc Delorme Research Station just outside Abidjan, Ivory Coast. Those large gaps in the otherwise beautifully laid out genebank were caused by lightning strikes! The labourers grow their cassava there now. I’d never heard of this particular threat to ex situ conserved agrobiodiversity. This particular parcel seems to have been particularly unlucky, attracting strikes repeatedly over the years.

A shattered genebank slowly comes back to life

You may remember Typhoon Xangsane, which hit the Philippines in deadly fashion just over a year ago, on 28 September 2006.  It was given the Tagalog name Milenyo, or Millennium.

What you may not know is that one of the victims of Milenyo was the national genebank of the Philippines — the National Plant Genetic Resources Laboratory — which is housed by the Institute of Plant Breeding in Los Baños. ((The International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) is also in Los Baños, of course, but although some of its facilities were also affected by Milenyo, its genebank was not damaged.))

Some of the results of the typhoon can be seen in the photo essay published by GRAIN not long after the event. Some 70% of the national collection was declared lost and the rest taken next door to IRRI for emergency storage under “black box” conditions.

I visited the genebank last Friday, and the recovery has definitely made some progress, including as a result of some timely financial assistance by the Global Crop Diversity Trust. But there’s still some way to go: much of the collection is still at IRRI for safe keeping.

In this picture, Nestor, who works at the genebank, shows how high the water got on that fateful day. You can also see, closer to the ground, the mark left by the mud which flowed through the building.

dscf5364small.JPG

Continue reading “A shattered genebank slowly comes back to life”

Tasty rice

dscf5329.JPG

I’m at IRRI in the Philippines the whole week (and the next, actually, but that’s another story) for a workshop to develop a global ex situ conservation strategy for rice genetic resources. More on that later. Right now, I just wanted to show you a photo I took today during a rice variety tasting the T.T. Chang Genetic Resources Centre laid on. There were about 20 different genotypes from around the world: normal and fragrant, white and black, loose and very sticky. They included Carolina Gold, which I blogged about a few days ago. It’s amazing how different rice varieties can taste.

Stem cells and endangered livestock breeds

A group of scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology has managed to turn fibroblasts, cells abundant in connective tissues, back into pluripotent, i.e. non-differentiated, stem cells. ((Wernig et al. 2007. In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature.))  This has caused quite a stir — and for good reason.

Because stem cells are pluripotent, they can in theory be turned into virtually any cell type in the body. Needless to say, such cells have tremendous potential for therapeutic intervention in all sorts of human maladies that result from cellular death or injury. Until now there have been mainly two ways to obtain stem cells: one involves the generation and subsequent destruction of  an embryo to extract embryonic (ES) stem cells,  the other relies on  isolation of adult stem cells, which have been found in all sorts of locations from the spinal chord to dental pulp.

But there are limitations and issues with both approaches: the derivation of ES cells evokes moral objections from many quarters because it necessitates the destruction of an embryo, while the use of adult stem cells is at present fraught with doubts about whether such cells are truly pluripotent. This is why this new development is considered such a breakthrough.

Why would a method to generate stem cells be relevant for saving endangered animal breeds? What if it were possible to turn pluripotent stem cells into eggs and sperm cells? Impossible, you say? Well, consider this: an article appeared in 2003 in the journal Science claiming that scientists had, indeed, managed to generate what seemed to look like egg cells from embryonic mouse stem cells. ((Hübner et al. 2003. Derivation of oocytes from mouse embryonic stem cells. Science 300:1251-56.)) Several other groups meanwhile seem to have coaxed stem cells to turn into primitive sperm cells, and at least one report has described the use of such sperm cells to generate live mouse offspring. ((Nayernia et al. 2006. In vitro-differentiated embryonic stem cells give rise to male gametes that can generate offspring mice. Developmental Cell 11:125-32.))

Much of this remains to be worked out and confirmed by other scientists, and given the incredibly complicated process of meiosis and maturation that egg and sperm cells have to undergo before becoming truly functional, many doubt this kind of approach will ever be feasible. Even the conversion of fibroblasts into stem cells is at present still very complicated and this recent report represents mostly a proof of principle. 

But just imagine if this were all to work: it might then be possible to go out into a field, pick a few small chunks of ear tissue from as many endangered cattle, goats or pigs as you want,  isolate the fibroblasts, turn them into stem cells, coax those into becoming eggs and sperm, make embryos, and put them into your freezer, where they could remain indefinitely. You could do this probably with a lot less effort than it often takes to ensure preservation of  rare animals in situ and would, moreover, be able to bank as much of a breed’s genomic variation as you’d like.

Maybe this will remain science fiction. Then again, nobody thought a sheep could be cloned either…. ((Contributed by H. Michael Kubisch))