The cause of the problem …

… was a growing sensation that our RSS feed — served through Google’s Feedburner — could be a liability, as there are signs that Google is neglecting Feedburner. If you’re reading this in a Feed Reader, you might want to change the details to point to https://agro.biodiver.se/feed/ or just delete and subscribe again, which should pick up the feed automagically.

The bigger problem is the people who subscribe by email. We think we’ve sorted this out too, by adding all existing subscribers to a new list at MailChimp. If you are one of those, you should be seeing this message in an email. If you want to continue getting a daily update by email, there’s no need to do anything else. If you want to unsubscribe, there’s a link at the bottom of the email.

I hope that’s all …

Apologies for the downtime

I know just enough about web servers to be dangerous, as anyone who has tried to visit the site since last Saturday knows. For this, I am really sorry. I think most things are now back to normal, although there are clearly problems with the categories. 1 And some things are just plain weird, still. These things take time. We’ll be thinking about the design; maybe going back to the old one, maybe trying something new. And we value your loyalty. So if there’s something not working, leave a comment here, or something.

The truly scary thing is the realisation that we are fast coming up on our 6th birthday. Perhaps everything will be working perfectly by then.

Here’s hoping.

Wow! I did it, and with a week to spare. Now just a couple of minor changes under the hood, as it were, and she’ll be good for another 5000 posts.

Uniting the conversation

We recently read Sweeping the Sleaze, by Oliver Reichenstein, 2 and agreed with much of what he said. So we got rid of the various sharing buttons on this blog, which weren’t actually being used all that much. But then, how to bring the conversations on various social sites together? Reichenstein answers the same rhetorical question thusly:

Is there a better way to “integrate Social Media”? Well, why don’t you just post the best reactions on the bottom of the article? Like this:

So we might try that. Over on Facebook, for example, Dirk Enneking, who thinks sourdough is superior to yeast 3 had this to say in response to my comment that a sourdough without yeast would be a very sorry affair.

@ Jeremy, it depends on who you subscribe to, some sourdoughs include yeasts, others are more purist: lB=Lactobacillus Lb. sanfransiscensis, Lb. farciminis, Lb. fermentum, Lb. brevis, Lb. plantarum, Lb. amylovorus, Lb. reuteri, Lb. pontis, Lb. panis, Lb. alimentarius, W. ciboria (F. Leroy, L. De Vuyst / Trends in Food Science & Technology 15 (2004) 67–78_

To which I responded:

@Dirk Enneking I wonder; the article you cite is a specifically industrial view of a culture for fermentation that is designed with uniformity and other “important functionality” in mind. I would be willing to bet that any starter culture (and sourdough is often a misnomer as the resulting bread can be not in the least sour) used by artisanal bakers and home bakers would contains yeasts as well as lactobacilli and other bacteria. But then, you probably know that: http://sourdough.com/forum/fake-sourdough

That last link is a dig at the fact that Dirk is in Australia, home of major fake sourdoughness.

The big question, of course, is whether we should continue to follow Reichenstein’s advice and copy conversations here. What do you reckon?

Normal service to be resumed, eventually

Sorry about the light blogging on my part lately, 4 due to being on the road with other things on my mind. When that happens in the future, as it probably will next week, do check up on us on Twitter, Facebook and Scoop.it, as there may still be some micro-blogging going on among the packing and unpacking. But you knew that.