CGIAR research on Cassava Brown Streak Disease

Catherine Njuguna, a communications specialist at IITA, left a lengthy comment explaining all the work being done to combat cassava brown streak disease. We asked if we could use it as a guest post. She sent this even longer article, which we’re happy to share.

Efforts to save Africa’s cassava from deadly viral diseases

The warning by Food and Agriculture Organization on the viral disease wreaking havoc cassava, an important staple in eastern and central Africa, was spot on and timely. It highlights the challenges posed by this new and not-so new disease, Cassava Brown Streak Disease, which is threatening the food security and livelihoods of over 200 million people who depend on the crop.

Together, the two diseases cause more than 1 billion USD worth of damage to Africa’s cassava. The already poor small-scale farmers bear the brunt of this loss.

On a positive note, a lot of work is being carried out by various the governments, researchers, donors, Non-governmental organizations and the farmers themselves, to combat not only the cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) but also cassava mosaic disease – another disease drastically affecting cassava in the region to avert the looming catastrophe. However, a, lot more still needs to be done as the two diseases continue to spread rapidly through the region.

Some of the activities we are carrying out at IITA in collaboration with our wide range of partners from other Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) centres, National Agricultural Research Systems, (NARS), Universities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), Community Based Organizations and Private sector include:

  • Breeding for varieties that are tolerant/ resistant to both the Cassava Brown Streak Disease (CBSD) and the Cassava Mosaic disease (CMD) using conventional and molecular assisted breeding: Efforts are under way to develop high yielding varieties resistant to the two diseases. While we have not had any success in CBSD resistant varieties, we have identified and are promoting varieties that are tolerant to the diseases – they show symptoms but still give acceptable yields.

In Zanzibar, the cassava production has been revived by four tolerant varieties developed together with Zanzibar researchers at Kizimbani research institute officially released in 2007. On mainland Tanzania working with researchers from the Ministry of Agriculture, Food Security and Cooperatives, 8 improved varieties for the Lake Zone region and 5 varieties for mid-altitude areas in tolerant to Cassava Mosaic Disease were officially released in 2009. They are also showing acceptable levels of tolerance to CBSD. IITA and partners including FAO, CRS are working to rapidly multiply and get to farmers clean planting material of these tolerant varieties. A further 8 varieties showing tolerance to both diseases for coastal lowlands are at an advanced trial phase.

Farmers in Ukerewe take part in participatory variety selection to help ensure new varieties meet their preferences

Breeding efforts are also underway in Uganda where varieties, crossed with tolerant varieties from Tanzania and showing acceptable levels of tolerance to the diseases under the harshest of disease pressure conditions are in the pipeline for release in a year or two after further testing.

Scientists are also using advanced technologies such as molecular marker-based breeding (MAB) for faster and more effective breeding of resistant cassava as conventional breeding takes between eight to twelve years to come up with the improved varieties.

However, as a vegetatively propagated plant, getting enough planting materials to meet the demand is a tremendous challenge. A lot of support is needed to devise rapid and efficient ways of getting healthy planting material of improved cassava varieties to needy farming communities as rapidly and efficiently as possible.

  • Understand disease epidemiology – Although cassava brown streak had been known in East Africa for many years, it had always been confined to lowland coastal areas. The new outbreaks defied existing research wisdom as rapid new spread was reported from the relatively high altitude regions (over 3000 feet above sea level) of Uganda, Kenya, and Tanzania around the shores of Lake Victoria. Research efforts are under way to understand what is driving this new spread. A lot of knowledge has now been generated on the virus (CBSV), developing diagnostic tools and basic technologies to manage the disease. However, a lot of research is still needed as the virus is very diverse.
  • Surveillance systems to track the spread of the diseases: Under the Great Lakes Cassava Initiative (GLCI) funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, a regional surveillance program was set up in 2009. It was made up of national agricultural research systems of Burundi, DRC, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda, IITA, Catholic Relief Services (CRS) and the UK’s Food and Environment Research Agency (FERA) among others to track the extent and speed of spread of CBSD and CMD in the five countries. This will assist in detecting when the disease spreads to new areas and help to identify areas of priority.
  • Whitefly vector: A lot of research is underway to understand the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci – the tiny insects transmit the viruses that cause the CMD and CBSD- how it spreads the disease and the relationship between it and the disease. Research is also underway to find a biological control to sustainably reduce its population.

Overview of IITA work on combating CBSD.

A brief of the two diseases

CBSD was first reported from Amani, Tanzania in 1936 but was mostly confined to the low lands of Eastern Africa and around Lake Malawi. However, from 2004, the disease, which causes a dry rot in the roots rendering them inedible, started spreading to mid-altitude areas and has drastically affected cassava production in Central and South-Western Uganda, North Western Tanzania, Western Kenya, and North Western DR Congo.

The disease damages the most economically important part of the crop, the roots. Furthermore, the symptoms are not always clear. A field of cassava looking healthy and vigorous up to the time of harvest can conceal the grim reality of rotten useless roots, revealed as the farmer digs up her long-anticipated crop.

CMD, on the other hand, also has a long history in Africa and was first reported in 1894 and the earliest management work initiated in 1930s in Tanganyika. However, an unusually severe form was first reported in Uganda in the late 1980s. The country experienced a severe epidemic that reduced national cassava yields by a third within three to four years severely affecting the food security. Efforts to develop disease resistant varieties were successful. CMD resistant varieties were developed, clean planting materials widely distributed and education in sound agronomic practices. By the early 2000s, major increases in cassava production were being realized in many affected countries, as resistant varieties spread. Many farmers who had stopped growing the crop in despair started growing it again. The work of disseminating the new varieties to farmers was supported through large-scale campaigns to raise awareness about the disease, its symptoms and measures to stop its spread

However, the emergence of CBSD has become an additional challenge for breeders and researchers to grapple with as crops that were developed and resistant to Cassava Mosaic disease were susceptible to the new disease.

Nibbles: New cassava, CBSD maps, Research, Pest management, Banana research

Is modern plant breeding bad for your health?

Gary Taubes has been making a pretty decent living of late pushing the line that sugar is a poison. His argument was recently summarized in The American Conservative, which should perhaps give pause for thought, but let that slide:

…to science journalist Gary Taubes the idea that successful weight loss depends on eating less and exercising more is a dangerous myth. In Why We Get Fat he argues that obesity is the result not of sloth, gluttony, or diets overly rich in calories and animal fats but comes instead from consuming too many carbohydrates, particularly from wheat flour and sugar.

You can also hear an interview with him on Skepticality. I’m not really able to judge the merits of his claim of sugar toxixity. Some of the things he says seem plausible to me, but I’m always suspicious of analyses of problems as complicated as the epidemic of obesity, heart disease and diabetes which miraculously find a single culprit. But that’s not really what I wanted to talk about here, though you are of course welcome to comment on that topic if you like. What I wanted to reflect on is the claim by Taubes in that interview I linked to above that modern plant breeders have consciously aimed at producing, and have been successful in developing, fruit that is ever-higher in sugar. Certainly provocative. But is it true?

So I put the question on the GIPB mailing list, and I got a number of interesting replies. Kicking off the discussion, Pat Heslop-Harrison said:

If you count tomato as a fruit, then Dani Zamir has some good data with Brix-number and has certainly been able to increase it (and solids).

But it hasn’t always been easy, apparently. Ron Clayman came back with this:

I had a tomato with 24brix. unfortunately it didn’t breed true. back to square one. I think it has something to do with the genetic pathway that produces ascorbic acid as it and fructose are similar molecules.

Aside for those among us who don’t obsess about sugar: “one degree Brix is 1 gram of sucrose in 100 grams of solution.” Moving on, Mark Hart of Mt. Ashwabay Vineyard & Orchard, Bayfield, WI, USA had this to say:

I am skeptical that sugar in fruit and produce has played any significant role in the increase in obesity. I think that is the opposite is true, that a switch from fruit consumption to artificially sweetened processed foods as been the driver behind obesity on the diet side (the activity side is equally important).

I breed grapes, and the sugar level in modern wine grapes is very similar to that found in wild Vitis vinifera (sylvestris) 20-24 brix. The range in other wild Vitis is wider, 15-30%, but the target for wine is driven by alcohol levels. In table grapes fruit firmness and sugar/acid balance is more important than absolute sugar level. The sugar level of grapes consumed has actually dropped as the fruit is increasingly transported and the need for firmness increased. People used to eat locally produced grapes that were actually ripe and at a high sugar content because they were not harvested 2 weeks and 2000 km from consumption.

A statement that supports the high sugar view can be found in this recent popular press article. A breeder of specialty tree fruit in California said: “We want real sugar fruit. We want you to have to go to the dentist.” Probably true, but I don’t know if it is effective PR.

Which elicited this from Harvey K. Hall in New Zealand:

It is interesting to read the comments of Mark Hart. Certainly I think that selection in a lot of small fruits is for higher sugar content but from my experience I would say that the cultivated varieties are not yet as high in Brix as some wild accessions that I have looked at, including red raspberries at a Brix of 16, blackberries with a similar Brix and a similar story with Ribes cultivars. The challenge for a breeder is to keep the Brix up while achieving higher yields, in other words getting the new cultivar to fix more sugars to accompany increased fruit production. In raspberries in particular it took a lot of work to get the Brix up with early breeding at East Malling. Tulameen also became popular because of its low acid and moderately high Brix.

There is plenty of room for improvement in fruit quality and a balanced sugar/acid ratio is a key to high fruit quality and customer appeal. Fortunately we do not have the issue of high carbs content that is found with cereals and especially added-sugar bakery products. Fruit is a good
relatively low carb dietary component that does not give a high glycemic spike in the morning and have us craving more carbs all day.

So from this very limited sample it does seem that high sugar content has indeed been a breeding objective in some fruits, but that it has not always been achieved, and that other characteristics have in fact taken precedence. Perhaps other fruit breeders out there — and fruit consumers for that matter — will add to the discussion.

That last point from Harvey about cereals reminded me that Professor Harriet Kuhnlein, a nutritionist at McGill University in Canada, had recently put a very similar request to my own for information about the results of modern plant breeding on a different mailing list, one populated by nutritionists this time, rather than breeders. She points to a Chicago Tribune article on William Davis’ recent book “Wheat Belly,” which suggest, among other things, that breeding semi-dwarf wheat has had some, ahem, unforeseen consequences:

His book, which has spent time this fall on The New York Times best-seller list for advice books, posits that when traditional wheat was genetically altered to become semi-dwarf wheat in the last century, it was assumed, without any testing, that the modifications would not change the way it affected those who ate it.

But Davis theorizes that those genetic changes could be responsible for the rise in celiac disease and gluten sensitivity we are seeing today. He further pinpoints unique compounds in wheat such as gliadin, amylopectin A and others as triggers of hunger, sharper blood sugar spikes, behavioral disorders and destructive inflammation.

Prof. Kuhnlein asked her nutritionist colleagues for help, but didn’t get very far:

I am getting questions from friends and I don’t know how to give an informed response. Does anyone in the network know whether or not “recent” wheat breeding has resulted in new risks for obesity? I have also seen something in the pop literature about pesticide resistance being inserted GM into wheat, that may also result in “allergies” and obesity. Who’s the wheat expert in the biodiversity and nutrition network? We need some authoritative responses in the media that are beyond the obvious — that too much wheat=obesity!

So, dear reader, whether you’re a wheat breeder or not: can you give Prof. Kuhnlein a helping hand?

Nibbles: Cassava bad and good news, Soybean domestication, Bitter gourd, Drought, Agrobiodiversity job, Heirloom turkey, Eurisco, Artisanal wheat, MSB, Food culture

Nibbles: Gums & resins, ITPGRFA, Soy sauce, Med diet, Aquaculture, Cacao, Sugar industry, Nomenclature, Yam (Chinese), Urban agriculture