The journal Plant Genetic Resources is planning a special edition on Unlocking the Potential of National Genebanks: Tools, Strategies and Impact Metrics for sustainable Global Conservation. Katherine Baum of the Australian Grains Genebank is the Guest Editor, and the deadline is 31 October 2025. Sounds like fun.
The Kunming Manifesto surfaces
Readers with a long memory will remember that I promised I would keep an eye on the manifesto that was supposed to come out of the 3rd International Agrobiodiversity Congress, held back in May. Well, it has arrived, the 2025 Kunming Manifesto: Agrobiodiversity for People and Planet. Here’s a taster:
The agrobiodiversity conservation, use, and success stories are largely the domain of women, who are often the most marginalized in marginalized groups. In tandem with greater inclusion, unlocking agrobiodiversity’s potential to help solve the world’s greatest challenges requires transformative intervention by governments around the world. This includes repurposing agricultural subsidies, enacting policies to support the seed production and distribution systems and embedding agrobiodiversity in the global fora that work to mitigate climate change, reverse biodiversity loss, control desertification, and eliminate hunger.
There are “actionable recommendations” on each of the topics of the Congress…
- Agrobiodiversity for Economic Growth
- Agrobiodiversity for Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation
- Agrobiodiversity for Improved Environmental Health and Biodiversity
- Agrobiodiversity for Healthy Diets
- Agrobiodiversity for Gender and Social Inclusion
- Agrobiodiversity Conservation and Management Strategies
…followed by suggested “next steps” for farmers and practitioners, policy makers, scientists, and the private sector.
Anything on genebanks? Well, lots on community seed banks, that’s for sure. But also this:
Because community seed banks are vital platforms for action learning and seed system strengthening, incentives and rights-based policies should be implemented to reward the contributions of custodian farmers. Additionally, increased support is needed for local and national genebanks, enhanced documentation and conservation of wild PGRFA and landraces, and greater investment in participatory plant breeding. Stronger national policies that enable farmers to commercialize seeds of farmer varieties need to be in place.
I have to say that, given some the people involved, I would have expected at least a passing reference to international genebanks, but I guess this particular Congress wasn’t the right place for that.
Nibbles: USDA Pullman genebank, Another Indonesian genebank, Somali community seedbank, Garlic moves genebanks, Enset conservation, Opportunity crop genebanks
- A primer on the USDA genebank in Pullman.
- Possible genebank in Indonesia. I could have sworn there was one already.
- Community genebank in Somalia. Surely not the only one.
- Garlic moves between genebanks. I’m sure there’s a reason.
- New enset products and processing methods are great, but is there a comprehensive genebank? I wish I could be sure.
- That goes for other “opportunity crops” and “forgotten foods” too.
Who feeds the world anyway?
For decades, the mantra of “feeding the world” has dominated discussions about agricultural development and food security. The logic sounds straightforward: more food production equals less hunger.
Michael Grunwald, in his new book Feeding the World But Killing the Planet, acknowledges agriculture’s environmental toll but insists that industrial farming—backed by technological fixes—is necessary to meet humanity’s caloric demands. He doesn’t challenge the system, he documents ways to optimize it.
But others argue this is a dangerous simplification. In The Enduring Fantasy of “Feeding the World”, which starts by quoting Grunwald, authors from the Agroecology Research-Action Collective contend that hunger isn’t primarily about food shortages — it’s about poverty, inequality, and political exclusion. The production-first mantra, they argue, legitimizes destructive farming practices that serve elites while leaving the root causes of hunger untouched. They come up with a slogan of their own for the alternative: “a world that feeds itself.”
One camp calls for systemic change — agroecology, local food sovereignty, and policies that tackle inequality. The other seeks to refine the existing model with new technologies that deliver efficiency gains. Both see the ecological risks, but diverge on whether to reinvent or retrofit the system. 1
It occurs to me that I could fall back on my own usual ploy of observing with a self-satisfied smirk that, either way, crop diversity will be needed. But maybe it’s time to do away with catchphrases altogether. It’s more complicated, and more important, than that.
Nibbles: Impact assessment, Kenyan veggies, African veggie genebank, Madd fruit, Moroccan fruits, Date palm, DOGE at USDA
- Modelling adoption of biofortified crops is no substitute for empirical field surveys. Kind of obvious, but I guess needed saying.
- Kenyans may not need biofortified crops, though. Assuming they are actually eating their traditional vegetables.
- There’s a whole genebank for Africa’s vegetables.
- Saba senegalensis is also naturally biofortified.
- The High Atlas Foundation is also on a fruit tree mission
- Is the date palm the most important fruit tree in the world, though?
- I wonder what will happen to USDA’s fruit tree collections.