Brainfood: Understanding conservation, Melon diversity, Brassica viruses, Livestock domestication, Parks and conservation, Intensification, Wild apple, Conservation planning, Pepper diversity, Silene diversity, Connectivity in restoration, Paying for conservation, Dog evolution, Pasture productivity

Nibbles: Large pumpkin, Wheat genome, Timorese nutrition, Seeds for Needs, PPB, Fruit trees, Nutrition ROI, Ecosystem services, Coffee costs, Cacao flavour, Pig slaughtering, Goats threats, Dog diet, Australian migrations

  • Wow, that’s one huge pumpkin!
  • Genomic whiz-bangery, which was apparently not involved in producing the above pumpkin, continues to hold much promise for wheat yields. And your jetpack is in the mail. I would ban the use of the word promise in this type of article. But since I can’t do that, I promise not to link to them ever again.
  • Jess gets to grips with Timorese nutrition. Get those local landraces back from any genebank that has them, Jess. And don’t forget to collect any remaining ones.
  • Then you could do some cool Seeds-for-Needs-type stuff.
  • And maybe some local breeding too?
  • And don’t forget local fruit trees!
  • Because you know investing in nutrition is really cost-effective.
  • Though of course it’s not just about the money.
  • Especially when it comes to coffee.
  • Or cacao for that matter.
  • They shoot hogs, don’t they? Maybe even in East Timor. Goats, alas, have problems of their own.
  • And as for dogs, we forced them to digest starch. What even the dingo? I bet there are dingo-like dogs in East Timor.

Brainfood: Climate in Cameroon, Payments for Conservation, Finger Millet, GWAS, Populus genome, miRNA, C4, Cadastres, Orange maize, Raised beds, Contingent valuation, Wild edibles, Sorghum genomics, Brazilian PGR, Citrus genomics

Brainfood: Core collections, Romanian pigs, Commons, Valuation, Biofortification, Yam characterization, Pompeii diet, Rice grain genetics

The value of Natura 2000

Speaking of return on conservation actions, which we sort of were a couple of days back:

A new study has produced the first indicative estimate of the overall economic benefits provided by the Natura 2000 network. It suggests that the value could be currently between €200 and €300 billion per year, or 2% to 3% of the EU’s Gross Domestic Product.

That’s from one item in a special Thematic Issue of the European Commission’s news alert organ Science for Environment Policy which focuses on “Management and Monitoring of the NATURA 2000 Network,” (pdf) a network of protected areas that is described in the editorial introducing the issue as the “cornerstone of EU biodiversity policy.”

Natura 2000 site at Bärwurzwiese, Belgium. Photo made available under a CC license by Frank Vassen via Flickr.
Here’s the table of contents the whet your appetite

  • What does ‘wilderness’ mean?
  • First EU-wide economic valuation of Natura 2000 network
  • Improved local management needed for the Natura 2000 network
  • Natura 2000 Case Study Hoge Kempen: from coal mining landscape to oasis of biodiversity
  • Improved communication about Natura 2000 may help resolve landowner conflicts
  • Ecotourism: protecting the nature of Natura 2000 in Latvia
  • Natura 2000 Case Study Slitere National Park: sustainable tourism in a Natura 2000 site
  • Natura 2000 Case Study Eurosite – Adaptive Management of Natura 2000 sites
  • Protected areas act as stepping stones for nature in the face of climate change
  • New Belgian approach to favourable conservation status for habitats and species of European interest
  • Sustaining the Natura 2000 network through LIFE

We’ve talked before about Natura 2000 in the context of conservation of crop wild relatives. I’m willing to bet that return on investment doesn’t take into account any species important in crop improvement that the network happens to be protecting. But if you know better, let us know.