Rational botanical gardens

The 7th European Botanic Gardens Congress is on this week, in Paris. You can follow it in all the usual ways, or most of them anyway. I was struck by this tweet from the opening day, of a slide from the presentation by new BGCI director Paul Smith. Sounds a lot like what we’re trying to do with crop genebanks around the world too.

There’s a botanical garden that is conserving one crop almost single-handedly, but Diane Ragone, who’s in charge of the the National Tropical Botanical Garden and its breadfruit collection, is at a different, and I suspect more entertaining, conference in Trinidad.

LATER: Paul’s vision is more fully set out here.

Brainfood: Weed collection, Japan vs China wheat, China wheat, Indian maize, Aromatic rice, African cattle, Food system vulnerabilities, SDGs & nutrition, Suitable days, Setaria phenotyping

Nibbles: Monocultures redux, Seedless watermelons, Red kiwifruit, Herbaria problems, Forest foods, Sorghum beer, SIRGEALC, Chinese veggies, Organic tomatoes, Andean women, Rise origins, Fermentation

Potato wild relatives: Too much of a good thing?

ResearchBlogging.orgWhat do you call it when you suddenly notice things you didn’t notice that much before, and wrongly assume that their frequency has increased? Is it apophenia? Observational selection bias? I’m sure it’s a thing, though I can’t remember its name. And I’m sure it’s frequency is increasing. Meta-apophenia is rampant, I tell you. Yesterday there was that bunch of papers on plant-pest co-evolution. Today two papers on cytoplasmic diversity in potato. I mean: what are the odds? 1

Anyway. One paper looked at 1,217 European cultivars and breeding clones, 2 the other at 978 accessions, breeding lines and varieties used or released by the breeding programme of the International Potato Centre (CIP). 3 The potato comes in 6 types of maternally-inherited cytoplasmic genomes: M, P, A, W, T and D. The use of the wild species Solanum demissum and S. stoloniferum in parental line and variety development around the world, due to the fact that they have some good pathogen resistance genes, has led to the prevalence of a couple of these. The papers report that 83% and 87% of the CIP and European material respectively had T or D cytoplasm types. In general, the CIP breeding programme was more diverse than the European, but not by all that much. Neither set of authors did the calculation, but the Shannon-Wiener diversity indeces were 0.42 for Europe and 0.58 for CIP, for what that’s worth.

Does it matter? Yes. Quite apart from the disadvantages of the resulting increasing genetic uniformity, these cytoplasm types are concidentally associated with male sterility. That makes them difficult to use in breeding.

…we found that CIP’s breeding germplasm as many others worldwide has experienced a genetic bottleneck in terms of cytoplasmic diversity and continuous incorporation of D- and W/c-type cytoplasms due to the unintended and continuous use of cytoplasmic-based male-sterile maternal lineages in its breeding program. Presumably, CIP breeding activity has already been hindered to a certain extent by sterility problems… CIP functions as a source for distributing breeding germplasm worldwide. Our results show that most of the CIP material distributed to developing countries has T- and D-type cytoplasm. Breeders in developing countries may experience breeding constraints imposed by pollen sterility associated with these cytoplasm types.

So it matters, but there’s a way out.

Nonetheless, male-fertile T-type breeding lines must have contributed to alleviate the problem, thus enabling progress for multiple traits in CIP breeding populations.

And also, D-type germplasm is not all bad. Both it and the M-type were positively correlated with late blight resistance, according to the Europe paper.

So, as ever, swings and roundabouts. Crop wild relatives can be really useful, but you have to careful not to get carried away.

Of plants and their pests

For whatever reason, there was a spate of papers on the coevolution of plants and their pests last week. Or at least I got to hear about them last week.

The one that got the most attention by the popular press — well, actually, the only one that got any attention by the popular press — was a study comparing changes in glucosinolates in the brassica family with speciation in the Pieridae butterflies, whose caterpillars feed on these plants. Glucosinolates give wasabi and mustard their zing (hence the press interest), but are deadly to insects, which is why they evolved in the first place. Each major innovation in the chemistry of glucosinolates since they first arose in the brassicas at the K-T boundary is correlated, the authors found, with a burst of diversification in detoxification mechanisms among the insects at which they were aimed.

The other two studies don’t delve quite so deeply back into evolutionary time, focusing on the role of domestication. The first looked at populations of the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) growing on a diversity of both crops and their wild relatives. The authors found that aphid populations on domesticated species were more genetically diverse, but evolved more slowly, because selection was less strong and populations larger, weakening the effect of genetic drift. Applying this result to the brassica-butterfly model would suggest that the strength of the association between glucosinolate and butterfly diversity should decrease for the domesticated brassicas compared to the wild ones, but I’m not sure this was looked at in that study.

The third paper investigated the apple’s fungal pathogen Venturia inaequalis. The dispersal characteristics of dozens of strains collected on both domesticated and wild apples in Kazakhstan were compared. The authors found that apple domestication has led to enhanced colonization capacity by the pathogen: strains from orchards have more, bigger spores. Seems to me that’s somewhat contradictory to the aphid example.

The relationship between plants and their pests is, well, complicated.