The status of wheat landraces in Tajikistan, Turkey and Uzbekistan

Six years in the making, FAO announced today the publication of surveys of wheat landraces in farmers’ fields in Tajikistan, Turkey and Uzbekistan. The work was done in collaboration with CIMMYT, ICARDA and national researchers. Although, perhaps surprisingly, dozens of landraces were still found — 162 distinct names in Turkey — they are certainly under threat:

Local landraces today account for less than 1 percent of total wheat production. Over the past 75 years, according to field surveys, the number of wheat landraces fell from 37 to 7 in Balikesir, a western province of Turkey.

Here’s the distribution of the landrace Zerun, according to the Turkey survey.

Screen Shot 2016-01-29 at 1.43.15 PM

There are 14 accessions with this name listed in Genesys, and they do indeed come from the region in question, though mainly from close to roads (click to see better):

turkey

It was not clear to me from the report of the work in Turkey whether samples were taken for ex situ conservation, or at least genotypic comparison with existing accessions. But if this one landrace is anything to go by, there might still be scope for some gap-filling collecting.

Scylla, meet Charybdis

It is much more expensive to produce many diverse locally adapted varieties, and more time-consuming. So big seed companies generally narrow their focus to reduce costs. The more the seed and breeding industries and communities become concentrated in a few mega-companies, the more these harmful trends will be exacerbated. But we’re reducing our adaptability just at the moment when we will need it the most.

Yeah, well, ok, sure. But then there’s foundations. Right? Well

For the foundations, it appears, the profitability of small farms remains more important than the amount of food they produce.

Ok, but how about public research sector?

Another global organisation over which the BMGF appears to exert strong influence is the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), a consortium of 15 research centres which is the world’s most influential network for agricultural research in developing countries.

What’s a poor farmer to do?

Documenting geographical origins of Indian products

Ever realised that the famous, red hot Naga Mirchi (a special variety of chilli from Nagaland) doesn’t have a Wikipedia page?

Well, no, as it happens, but in any case that’s apparently about to change. According to an article in The Hindu, there’s something called an edit-a-thon going on right now that will provide wikipedia pages for Indian products which have been registered for geographical indication (GI). Quite a few other agricultural products are slated for inclusion apart from that notorious Nagaland pepper. Navara rice from Kerala caught my eye. There’s a specimen at IRRI labelled with that name. Also Bhalia wheat from Gujarat. Which unfortunately, in contrast to Navara rice, Genesys drew a blank on. An earlier article in The Hindu gives an alternative appellation, Daudkhani. That name is associated with an accession in the CIMMYT genebank. But that’s from Pakistan.

Brainfood: Lima bean cyanide, Hybrid powdery mildew, Amaranth core, Cotton core, Tibetan sheep, Water buffalo history