
Yeah, well, in the end I didn’t win. But I’m not bitter. Not much.
Agrobiodiversity is crops, livestock, foodways, microbes, pollinators, wild relatives …

Yeah, well, in the end I didn’t win. But I’m not bitter. Not much.
Much harm has been done. In the past century about three-quarters of global crop genetic diversity is thought to have been lost, and with it many potentially beneficial traits. Preserving what remains is an insurance policy against the effects of climate change: Britain’s Millennium Seed Bank, the world’s largest, cost £73m ($112m) to complete in 2010. The damage from the brown planthopper came to $1 billion in today’s money. Governments should share species and fund seed banks. Their work is a vital safeguard against hunger.
That’s from a leader in The Economist, one of three pieces on the conservation and use of crop diversity in this week’s issue. Which the writers got through without even once mentioning Svalbard, but were not, alas, able to negotiate without resorting to the dreaded 75% number. On balance, though, I’ll take it.
Well, all I can say is that it’s not every day that you wake up to three articles on genebanks in The Economist:
Paulo van Breugel tells us how to look for species that fulfill multiple functions in ICRAF’s new database thingy:
On each vegetation fact sheet there is a link to an excel workbook which lists the species and all their functions of that vegetation types. It allows you to do searches using multiple criteria using filters. See also the short tutorial.
Allrighty then.