A Norwegian wheat landrace comes home

There’s a great story on the website of the Norwegian Forest & Landscape Institute, which includes the national Genetic Resources Centre. Unfortunately, it seems to be available only in Norwegian, but Google Translate does do a reasonable job on it (I hope).

The gist of the story is that seeds of a local wheat landrace called Messel, thought lost, have been recovered:

Øyvind Messel, the oldest person on the farm today, says that it was his grandmother Torborg Øvensdatter Haabestad who brought the seed of a wheat variety from her home farm when she married the Messel around 1850. This was cultivated and developed by her sons who ran the farm in the early 1900s when Messel wheat became known.

The variety was popular for a time, but seems to have gone out of cultivation in Norway with the coming of modern varieties.

And there the story could have ended, and Messel wheat would have disappeared for good, if it had not been for the Russian scientist Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov, who was director of the Institute for Applied Botany in Leningrad from 1921. He traveled around the world and was a pioneer when it came to collecting seeds of plant varieties and to investigate the genetic variation between varieties from different parts of the world.

His travel notes indicate that he visited Oslo sometime between 1916 and 1940. When a packet of seeds of Messel wheat marked 1923 pops up [in the Vavilov Institute], one can imagine that he must have met agricultural researchers in the Oslo area at that time, perhaps researchers at the agricultural college at Ås who ran experiments on Norwegian landraces of wheat.

Good old Vavilov.

Messel Wheat is now included in the sample of old cultivars examined in the project Conservation and use of ancient grains that the Norwegian agricultural advisory services agency in Østafjells implements with support from the Norwegian Genetic Resource Centre. The project also includes the operation of an seed bank, where grain growers who want to try out old cultivars can get 1-2 kg seed for their own trials and for further development. Last year 93 batches of 31 varieties were send from this seed bank.

Interesting. But would that be allowed in the EU?

LATER. Thanks to the power of Twitter, an almost immediate answer to that question:

Sudan genebank gets a boost

Interesting news from Sudan, via Facebook:

The Plant Genetic Resources Unit of the Agricultural Research Corporation (ARC) of Sudan has been upgraded to a centre with the new name “Agricultural Plant Genetic Resources Conservation and Research Centre” according to the decision of the Director General, ARC on 20 Oct. 2014 following the approval by the Minister of Agriculture and Irrigation.

sudan

Something similar recently happened in Kenya, although it doesn’t yet seem to be reflected in that genebank’s web page. Is there something in the air in East Africa?

Anyway, congratulations to Dr Mohammed El-Tahir, the head of the genebank, and his colleagues in Wad Medani. Here he is, with the lady in charge of genebank documentation, back in 2005, when I was last there.

DSCF0583

The identity of “millet” in East Africa

A blog post from the Chicago Council on Global Affairs a couple of days ago reminded me that we had blogged about GYGA — the Global Yield Gap and Water Productivity Atlas — a couple of years back. Just to remind us all

…the target of the Global Yield Gap Atlas (GYGA) is to provide best available estimates of the exploitable yield gap (Yg-E) — difference between current average farm yields and 80% of Yp and Yw. Water resources to support rainfed and irrigated agriculture also are limited, which means efficiency in converting water to food, water productivity (WP), is another key food security benchmark included in the Atlas.

I’ve had a quick look at the GYGA website, and it seems serviceable enough, though it has the drawbacks, often remarked on in these pages, that it is difficult to share the maps you make, and import your own data into them. Here I’d like to point out another potential issue, though. This is what you get when you look at the yield gap for “rainfed millet.” Because of the aforementioned drawbacks, a clunky screenshot is the best I can manage, I’m afraid.

Screen Shot 2014-10-27 at 3.46.02 PM

Now, the stuff in West Africa is clearly pearl millet, but what about in East Africa? Is there really that much pearl millet in Uganda, say? This is what Genesys knows about the two millets in East Africa. And yes, it’s a clunky screen grab too, but if I had wanted to, I could have downloaded separate KML files for the two crops and opened them both in Google Earth and then exported a nice JPG.

Screen Shot 2014-10-27 at 4.47.16 PM

Pink is pearl, yellow is finger. There’s a little bit of pearl millet in Uganda, but not all that much. The millet there is mainly finger millet. So, which is the millet in GYGA? Is it confusing the two?