Agrobiodiversity is crops, livestock, foodways, microbes, pollinators, wild relatives …
Dirk sets us straight on those Santorini sweet peas:
The charred sweet peas from Santorini are actually Lathyrus clymenum, the Santorini Fava bean. The crop is still cultivated on the island. Prepared as a pulse, Santorini fava is eaten by tourists and locals. No worries about seed toxins which are identical and at higher levels than those in grasspea.
For some reason, there’s been a sackful of coffee stories lately. Here’s a quick summary:
“Pistols for two, and coffee for one.”
“[Coffee] is of excellent Use in the time of Pestilence, and contributes greatly to prevent the spreading of Infection.”
“We just had to try at least a cup in every village we stopped at, and as they were small cups, sometimes more than one… The irony is that I am a ‘tea-only girl’.”
“Yes, Starbucks has announced it’s taking up shop in Bogota, Colombia. It says it wants to celebrate Colombian coffee.”
“Here, we do not work hard for survival, but we work hard to live a better life; that is what I’ve learned from working on this plantation.”
“In order to create these pre-breeding populations with enough genetic diversity for these economically important traits, WCR 1 will utilize genetic material from the current germplasm collections as well as new material coming from wild populations from the WCR GERMPLASM Project.”
I think the following Twitter exchange is pretty self-explanatory.
https://twitter.com/soyshadow/statuses/371571357550518272
But let me break it down anyway, as I have a feeling you may not be able to see the whole conversation without the sort of extra clicking that we’re always told users don’t like to do. Farmer finds 5-seed soybean pod, which is kinda unusual, apparently. Seed company makes much of it on both Twitter and Facebook. Soybean breeder says: that’s nothing, some wild species have more than 8 seeds per pod! Luigi tries to figure out which ones by trawling GRIN, to no avail. Breeder comes up with factsheet on Glycine tabacina, which is interesting enough but not really the point. Another fine day in Genebank Database Hell.
A quick follow-up to our post a couple of days back on the price of onions in India. Yesterday the Wall Street Journal, no less, weighed in on the subject, with a reference to a report commissioned by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to get to the bottom of…
…volatility of onion prices and its relationship with distribution in the what the CCI described as a “loose and casual market.”
According to one of the authors, quoted by the WSJ:
There is almost an oligopoly kind of situation and until there are multiple players, the price will be dictated by a few traders.
So it’s all down to those pesky middlemen, it seems. Farmers have no chance:
Farmers generally take reference of the local markets’ rates, while traders compare rates of all markets, including major distant and export markets and then decide where to send their produce
Ah, but wait. There’s also news of a World Bank pilot project to crowdsource price data on agricultural commodities which may solve that little problem. Here’s the onion data from last year. 2 I’m not sure whether in due course we’ll also have this year’s, and thus be able to see that 200% year-on-year increase in July mentioned by the WSJ.
I guess the real challenge is to get these numbers out in real time, and in a way that farmers can make use of. There’s clearly a way to go:
What did we learn? The results from the pilot tell us that, yes, the crowd can collect reliable and timely prices – but you need to provide incentives and implement good verification and validation processes. The resulting data are comparable over time and space, and timeliness is pretty good — the time lag is only about a month. And, importantly, the resulting data are open to all users.
A good start, no doubt, but I’m not sure that a month after the event is going to be of much use to farmers. Other similar efforts are underway, though, so maybe one of these “thousand points of light” will emerge as a bit brighter than the others. After all, if weather, why not prices?
Why is this important for agricultural biodiversity? Well, for a start, markets have been touted as the saviours of neglected and underutilized crops, and maybe even landraces of the more successful and overused sort. Wouldn’t do if they were “loose and casual”, now would it?
Meanwhile, can we have the same for fish?