A short piece in The Times of India 1 pointed me to a longer version of basically the same press release on an interesting project to map the sacred forests of the world. This is a collaboration between the Oxford Biodiversity Institute and the Alliance for Religion and Conservation (ARC), the latter of which is new to me. Worth keeping an eye on. Unfortunately none of the players involved seem to have heard of RSS.
Ecological intensification at IBC18
Doyle McKey‘s presentation at IBC18 sounds like a doozy. I was alerted to it by Eve Emshwiller on Twitter, who said, among other things:
McKey: ecological intensification, not just green revolution model “intensification” of ag needed. #ibc18
Music to our ears, of course. Here’s a summary from the (very large) Abstract Book of the congress.
The evolutionary ecology of plant chemical defenses in agroecosystems: past, present and future.
McKey, Gleadow, Cavagnaro
Plant chemical defenses mediate interactions between plants, their herbivores and pathogens, and the naturalenemies of these plant parasites. In domesticated plants, farmers are added to this web of interactions. Plant defenses have been subjected to complex selection pressures under domestication, leading both to decreases and to increases in their concentration, and to shifts in their intra-plant distribution. This complexity is explained partly by variation in the kinds of plants farmers chose to domesticate, and partly by the kinds of environments that nature and farmers combined to create in agroecosystems. Today, the interactions mediated by plant defenses are affected by changing climate, rising temperature and increased atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide. These changes can threaten food security by lowering not only the production of food but also its nutritional quality. The strategies proposed to counter these threats envisage a wide range of ways, not mutually exclusive, to manage biotic interactions in agroecosystems. These include modifying crop plants’ natural constitutive and induced defenses and other sources of resistance; engineering crop plants to express novel defenses; and increasing the effectiveness of ‘integrated pest management’ (through natural enemies, other components of agrobiodiversity and pesticides) by modifying the structure and functioning of agroecosystems. In this presentation, we examine these proposed solutions through the evolutionary ecologist’s lens: What are their respective costs and benefits, and how do these affect the ecological situations in which each could help farmers produce sufficient amounts of high-quality food? How can the coevolutionary dynamics of interactions between crop plants and their biotic environment be managed to avert catastrophic fluctuation of yield?
A day in the life of archaeologists
Today is Day of Archaeology 2011 and a whole bunch of archaeologists are going to tell you about their day using social media. I bet many of them are digging up the remains of farming communities and studying the origins of agriculture. A great idea. How about A Day in the Life of a Genebanker next? Via.
Unlocking a presentation on unlocking agriculture’s past
The talk that Jacob is planning to give later today at the National Geographic store in Madrid (and you can follow online) is now available on Slideshare.
LATER: I forgot to use a hashtag, but you can see my live-tweeting of Jacob’s talk by searching for his name. Maybe Jacob can tell us if the video will be available in due course. And no, he didn’t answer my online question about the difference between oca and potato. Wimp.
Featured: Lathyrism
Dirk Enneking gives us chapter and verse on grasspea and neurolathyrism and flooding.
Despite the paucity of documented evidence on the association of lathyrism with floods, many documents repeat the mantra that grasspea survives droughts and floods better than other crops…
With multiple citation goodness.
