One view of plant patents and other forms of intellectual property rights

Let’s say you go to a restaurant and have a lemon cheesecake. You love it, so you reverse engineer it in your mind and make it at home to serve a Tupperware party. As soon as the party starts, jack-booted thugs arrive wielding guns and drag you away as a criminal for stealing a recipe. The cook is dragged away, same as a real thief or murderer.

That is the short version of what has happened to the food and agriculture industry over the last 30 or so years

Jeffrey A. Tucker, of the Ludwig von Mises Institute, explains “agri-patents”.

Not exactly how I would describe the way things stand, but then, I haven’t had to tussle with the jack-booted thugs of the intellectual property rights owners. Not even in a movie. 1 Nor, I suspect, has the author of the piece, whose logic, I have to confess, I found somewhat hard to follow. Plant patents etc. are “not an evil of the market; they are an evil of government intervention,” and as such “have handed socialists the best case they’ve ever had to rail against capitalistic exploitation”. Maybe there’s another way of looking at these things?

Ancient wild relatives

While we’re on the subject of radicchio diversity, old Roman medicines and the like, we were pleased to be sent a link to Renaissance Herbals, a collaboration between the Smithsonian Institution and the Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Roma. There are some lovely images to peruse and use, like this one, of wild chicory, Cichorium intybus.:

One could complain, of course, that the links between the illustrations and other sorts of information are non-existent. But hey, you can’t have everything.