Canadians inventory biodiversity

Mary at Open Helix points to Dorothy at The Book of Trogool who says we should all take a look at Canadensys (hohoho). Dorothy says that Canadensys “is trying to collect biodiversity information from various researcher networks”. Canadensys says:

The mission of Canadensys is to unlock the specimen information held by Canadian university-based biological collections and share this via a network of distributed databases, compatible with other biodiversity information networks like CBIF and GBIF. In its initial phase, the network focuses on data of three of the most diverse, ecologically and economically important groups of organisms: plants, insects and fungi, the latter two representing some of the most poorly understood and inventoried organisms world-wide.

As Dorothy further points out, “their technical infrastructure is very much “use what you have; build only what you must”. Gosh, that sounds like a plan.

Big questions await intrepid database explorers. How are they dealing with agriculture? Might this become another gateway out of GBDBHell? Go ahead and rush in where I fear to tread.

Featured: multilocational trials

Robert is not convinced by Dave Wood:

David, or anyone else out there, can you say more about “the really vast data base from up to 50 years of multi-locational trials carried out as a matter of course by CGIAR institutes. “? There is some data (for about 10 years) on the CIMMYT website for wheat and maize. It is a bit difficult to understand and access; but it is something. What about the other crops and centers?

Well? The ball is now officially in Dave’s court.

ABD blogger scoops huge award

The Crop Science Society of America recently announced its annual awards, to be presented at the Society’s annual meetings in Pittsburgh on 3 November, next week. We couldn’t be happier about the Calvin Sperling Biodiversity Memorial Lectureship, which goes to our friend and sometime blogger here, Robert. J. Hijmans. As the announcement says,

“Robert Hijmans is an assistant professor in the Department of Environmental Science and Policy at the University of California-Davis. … His program focuses mainly on modeling of the spatial and temporal dynamics of natural and cultivated biodiversity, agricultural geography and development, and spatial informatics.”

His lecture promises to be fascinating. If you’re in Pittsburgh for the CSSA meetings, go. Will technology allow us to share it?

There are some other awards in there that recognize the importance of agricultural biodiversity.

  • José F. M. Valls picks up the Frank N. Meyer Medal for Plant Genetic Resources for his work on the collection, conservation, and characterization of forage grass and wild peanut germplasm.
  • Maarten Van Ginkel, of ICARDA in Syria, gets the International Service in Crop Science Award. He contributed to breeding more than 100 bread wheat varieties.
  • And, illustrating yet again the truth of Matthew 25:29, the CSSA Presidential Award goes to Gebisa Ejeta of Purdue University, winner of this year’s World Food Prize. Not that we begrudge him the honour for a second.

Congratulations to all the winners.

Development Marketplace

The World Bank’s Development Marketplace opens its doors on Tuesday 10 November. The idea is “to identify 20 to 25 innovative, early-stage projects addressing climate adaptation” and support them with grants of up to USD 200,000.

You may remember that last year our friend Hannes Dempewolf was one of the winners. 1 Is there anything this year of interest to agricultural biodiversity? Hard to say, mostly because the list of 100 finalists is available only as a PDF and doesn’t give a whole heap of information, but on past form, there’s bound to be. The Development Marketplace blog may be the place to follow the action, and if you’re around the World Bank, and have registered at the Marketplace’s web site, why not visit and send us your predictions of likely winners?

Featured: Breeding

Dave Wood says lets not rush into breeding for climate change:

There are three distinct existing resources we can tap.
The first is the ability of crops to thrive after long-distance introduction. …
The second resource is the really vast data base from up to 50 years of multi-locational trials carried out as a matter of course by CGIAR institutes. …
The third resource is climate-matching. …

You need to read his examples. And when you have, you may find you agree. Or not.