Dietary diversity improves nutrition

An absolutely fascinating paper from FANTA (Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance) reports the outcome of a study of Dietary Diversity as a Measure of Women’s Diet Quality in Resource-Poor Areas: Results from Rural Bangladesh Site. I’ve only read the Executive Summary, I confess, but the take-home messages are clear.

Our results from rural Bangladesh indicate that micronutrient intakes were very inadequate indeed. We note that intakes were inadequate for all micronutrients, not just those that are the usual focus of public health interventions (iron/folate during pregnancy, vitamin A, and iodine). The major deficits identified here will not be alleviated by programs narrowly focused on one or several micronutrients.

How then can those deficits be alleviated?

The study developed a range of indicators of dietary diversity and dietary quality, based on women’s recollections of what they had eaten during the previous 24 hours and assessing how well that delivered each of 11 micronutrients. Even for women who were getting far less than the recommended amounts, those who ate a more diverse diet nevertheless got more micronutrients, and this was independent of the total amount of food they ate.

Although other food groups were eaten in small quantities, they provided substantial proportions of the folate, vitamin A, vitamin C, and calcium in the diet, and all of the vitamin B12 (because this last is found only in animal-source foods). The most nutritionally important of these other food groups, in roughly descending order of importance in the diet, were dark green leafy vegetables; fish; nuts and seeds; dairy; “other” vegetables; vitamin C-rich vegetables; eggs; and vitamin C-rich fruits.

These analyses showed that the increases in nutrient intakes and adequacy that accompany increases in diversity result both from increased total intakes (reflected in energy intakes) and from increases in the nutrient density of the diet.

Dark green leafy vegetables, fish, nuts and seeds; these are not terribly difficult things to grow and make available at a very local level. The health benefits are immense, and because of the effects of maternal nutrition on the growth and development of their children would be felt for years. But how many governments, how many aid agencies and charities, how many projects, are actually pushing dietary diversity as a solution to malnutrition?

Fancy that! Rice plantings up, poppies down

FAO announced a couple of days ago that “Rice production in Asia, Africa and Latin America is forecast to reach a new record level in 2008”. I’m astounded. Imagine that. Farmers respond to higher prices by planting more. And in other press-stopping news, the Corriere della Sera said yesterday that farmers in Afghanistan are abandoning fusty old opium poppies for wheat, lured by a tripling of wheat prices. Right, that’s going to continue.

Another NGO web site

Ron Cross, Communications Officer for USC Canada, dropped us a note:

I work for a Canadian NGO – USC Canada – that works primarily on agriculture programs with small-scale farmers in parts of Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Working with small local NGOs, we support programs, training, and policies that strengthen biodiversity, food sovereignty, and the rights of those at the heart of resilient food systems – women, indigenous peoples, and small-scale farmers.

In all that we do, we take the view that genetic diversity, created by small-scale farmers, is the planet’s most vital resource, and I would like to ask that you add our website to your list of links.

Happy to oblige. and to take the opportunity to say again that we don’t necessarily endorse all (or any) of the points of view on sites we link to. For example, how can anyone claim that “Terminator” seeds are a serious global threat? But here is not the place for that argument.

Call the cops

Update: things are almost back as they were, and that’s how I’m leaving them.

You may have noticed some changes here. They’re not my fault, honest.

I decided to upgrade to the new version of our software, and quite by chance discovered that nefarious actors had hacked the site. A cunning wheeze, designed to place links inside posts but not have anything visible on the outside. It took an awfully long time to clean up, and in the process I upgraded everything, so things should be more secure now. BUT …

I cannot seem to figure out how to get the two sidebars back as they were, one on either side of the main content. Then again, maybe I shouldn’t bother. Leave a comment to say whether you prefer this version or one on either side. If necessary, I’ll get back to that.

I also cannot make those dinky little bullet points show up when we have several items in a Nibble. that has to be fairly simple, but I fear that if I keep going at it now, gone midnight, I’ll make some even greater error.

  • Maybe
  • Bullets

Work in an ordinary post?