When even lots of diversity is not enough

It was great to hear on the BBC’s Food Programme about all the cool stuff that’s going on in India to preserve its agricultural biodiversity. But it’s as well to remember that even such mega-diverse countries, and its farmers, can’t do it all on their own. By coincidence, after listening to Dan Saladino being schooled on the awesomeness of so-called “minor” millets, I read a paper on one of these, kodo millet, which suggested that, despite the diversity available, especially in Bihar, access to the African genepool and wild species would still be useful to broaden the genetic base of the crop in India.

Nibbles: Indian agrobiodiversity, High throughput phenotyping, Diet history, Barley and health, Fish biodiversity, Earthworm diversity, Livestock disasters, Irvingia domestication, Caffeine extraction

Brainfood: PVP in Africa, Tomato disease resistance, Open source seeds, Barley protein, Improving roots, Bambara groundnut, Indian kodo millet, Cacao diversity, Washington heirloom beans, Mato Grosso cassava, Balanites biotech, Intensive Europe

Building a prize-winning cassava house

We often say that crop diversity is the foundation of food security, but you have to actually build a house on a foundation, to get the full benefit. So it’s instructive occasionally to consider all the myriad other things that have to go right for crop diversity to have an impact, quite apart from breeding. And it’s great to see recognition for an organization that works on a number of those things: the Queen’s Anniversary Prize was just awarded to the UK’s University of Greenwich for the cassava work of the Natural Resources Institute, which includes everything from pest and disease control to processing and product development. Congratulations!

And if you still want to read something about how to use cassava diversity to provide the foundation for all that cool stuff NRI does, The Economist has you covered.

Call for articles: Valuing underutilised crops

We are looking for stories that analyse how underutilised crops have been revalued. We seek examples of communities that continued growing and processing them contrary to dominant trends. What were the successful strategies and the challenges to reviving the knowledge and the use of the underutilised crop? How did production, processing and preparation of food change? What role did markets, policy, research or local food and farmers’ movements play? What changes did this bring to rural and urban communities? What was the role of youth?

Any ideas?