Stable identifiers for genebank accessions still a dream?

Natural history collections and herbaria contain many millions of specimens that are used for research. When scientists publish their results they cite which specimens they used so that other scientists can both check the work and build on what has been achieved.

Institutions that hold specimens are publishing increasing amounts of data about (and images of) their specimens on-line. We need to have a way for scientists to reference specimens so that someone reading research results can simply click a link to see the supporting data and perhaps an image. To make this happen we need stable web links to the specimens that the holding institutions commit to maintain for the long term and that are implemented in a similar way across many institutions. Once this mechanism is widely adopted machines will be able to exploit the links to specimens to help do entirely new kinds of research.

This meeting was about establishing a consistent mechanism that will work across institutions.

Yes! And genebank accessions? When can we have some movement on that?

Brainfood: Maize rhizosphere, Climate change vulnerability, Heterosis squared, African forests, Sequencing genebanks

Nibbles: Tree domestication, Sacred groves, Solomons aquaculture, Bees and diversity

  • Cultivate medicinal trees to save them. Oh, and provide medicines.
  • Or you could harvest them sustainably from sacred forests?
  • Reef fished out? Aquaculture to the rescue. Sounds a bit like the aquatic equivalent of the above, no? But do they have sea cucumbers and their poop in those inland ponds?
  • Growing diverse crops good for bees, good for crops. Buckwheat diverse enough for ya?

Nibbles: Indian farmer, Indian farming landscape, Guatemalan protected areas, Old phones, Geo-data, HarvestPlus funding, Cavia, Agronomy, Bee bank, De-extinction

Atlas of Living Australia in the spotlight, again

Commenting on a comment on my slightly disappointed take on a couple of new spatial datasets yesterday, our regular reader Glenn Hyman, another CGIAR CGI uber-geek, muses thus:

If I was a young GIS geek, I think I would concentrate on how to create online applications for the non-expert.

Do you mean, Glenn, the kind of “online application for the non-expert” which the Atlas of Living Australia aspires, with considerable success, to be? Which coincidentally is being so actively discussed on Twitter just now. 1 And which I need to road test again very soon, as there have been significant changes since the last time I took it around the block.