Featured: Genebank payments

Ehsan reminds us of one of the complexities of genebanks charging for accessions:

Often genebanks holds collections arising from other countries from which the accession has been collected. Then, how ethical would it be for a country to request for materials collected from its country and have to pay for it. I think this is another point which should be taken in to consideration.

Lots of other comments, do have a look and add your own.

Featured: Online mapping

Cédric Jeanneret-Grosjean thinks he knows why a couple of online mapping tools made me cry recently:

About your patience running out, you can’t really blame the “geeks”. I think the culprits in these initiative (customised online-web map portals two-O and variants) are the bored, misdirected info-comm-know managers and officers wanting such a tool on their corporate website.

Why don’t you tell us what you really think, Cédric? It’s a long comment, but well worth reading in full. And many thanks to Cédric for taking the time to respond to the post.

Featured: Livestock data jungle

Tim Robinson updates us on livestock data at FAO:

…We had, of course, been working on the collection of the underlying livestock statistics, and the spatial modelling to produce the maps, for many years prior to them being published on the FAO website … but that is all quickly forgotten when they are re-distributed by a third party.

For your information, we have been beavering away since then, collecting more recent and detailed sub-national livestock statistics and disaggregating these using a slightly modified modelling approach, and 1 km multi-temporal, Fourier-processed MODIS imagery from the University of Oxford…

Global datasets coming soon, apparently. We’ll keep you posted.