Featured: Economist

Robert reads a writer’s mind:

He claims that “old-fashioned seeds are better at dealing with variable weather”. It is my impression that he wanted to avoid that his readers draw the conclusion that these seeds should therefore be reinstituted; which would seem logical. And so he brings it up to dismiss it, as “their use will mean less food”.

I’m not so sure.

Featured: ICTs in rural Kenya

Kevin makes a good point about the use of Google in rural Kenya:

Good story but a slight cavil. It wasn’t Google that “helped harvest a bumper crop” but the source of information he found on Google – wherever that was from. And of course, if the crops had failed I doubt whether the news story would have said “Google responsible for disastrous harvest.”

Featured: Plant property rights

The Evil Fruit Lord sounds off:

I have gotten more and more alarmed over the past few years at the level of hostility found among many well-educated, progressive people, to the very concept of intellectual property rights in plants (as in people owning rights to plant varieties, not plants themselves holding patents, which I’m not sure I’m cool with either). On some level I take this really personally, because it almost seems like its saying, basically, that what I do as a plant breeder has no real value. Why else would it be absolutely okay for everybody to share freely in the products of my labor?

There’s more. Should we worry about the end of plant breeding?