I’m not entirely sure how we missed that data on India’s enormous germplasm collection is now online. While this is welcome, I think it’s fair to say that NBPGR’s PGR Portal still needs some work in terms of user experience. It took me a while to figure out, for example, that if you type a letter under “Crop/Plant Name,” in Passport or in Characterization and Evaluation Search, you get a list of crops beginning with that letter, which you can then choose from. ((Though maybe I should have read the handy tutorial.)) Once you do that you get a list of taxonomic names to choose from, but you can only select one at a time to do your search. And why no rice data at all? There is a nice way of looking at the distribution of different character states for each characterization and evaluation descriptor, but no mapping facility. And you can’t use the portal to order germplasm. To do that you have to fill in a form, which makes no mention of the International Treaty on PGRFA or its SMTA, and email it in. And there are some funny restrictions on use: “All users can search and see the desired information. only registered users can copy and download.” But I couldn’t find a way to register. So, good to see, though clearly a work in progress. Will follow its development closely, and hope to see it link up with Genesys in due course, joining the CGIAR, European and US genebanks.
Zeolite vs Silica Gel: Deathmatch
The Horticulture Collaborative Research Support Program at UCDavis has a nice factsheet out about Zeolite Desiccant Beads. Why?
Zeolite beads, used with airtight containers, are a simple, inexpensive and widely adaptable method for drying horticultural seeds and maintaining high seed‐quality during storage. The beads can be reused by baking between use.
And of course we know that’s important:
In tropical climates, high humidity causes rapid seed deterioration, resulting in poor stand establishment, lower productivity, less value and disincentive to invest in improved seeds.
Although farmers seem to be the clients here, I thought perhaps this might be a good, relatively low-cost solution for genebanks too, so I ran the factsheet past some seed experts at Kew and IRRI. Thanks to both of them for allowing me to quote them.
It turned out that Fiona Hay, formerly at the Millennium Seed Bank at Kew and now at IRRI, has had quite a lot of experience with zeolite.
Indeed, we have done some work on these zeolite (=molecular sieve) drying beads on rice … in collaboration with the company, Rhino Research, in Thailand that is marketing them (and holds the patent — I’m not sure in which countries). See attachment..
Yes, they are a good desiccator, my concerns are that they could be too good and that they don’t appear to work as described — they don’t take up the same amount of water from the seeds as they do when they are placed over water. This means that is isn’t obvious how to calculate the right quantity of beads to use to dry seeds to a required moisture content. This is based on our work on rice (three different fresh seed lots), but seems to be at odds with what Kent Bradford (UC-Davis) has found for horticultural crops.
In terms of their use by farmers — I don’t think this technology is what they need. If the HORTCRSP project helps them to understand the need to dry seeds, OK; but there may be cheaper, simpler options.
They could be of more use in a genebank situation — once we know how to use them optimally. We are doing more work on this. One of Rhino’s latest products using the beads are bins containing a core of beads which is in contact with some indicating silica gel. Seeds are put in the bin and the silica is used to know when to regenerate the beads. This could be useful for genebanks without proper drying and/or storage facilities. I’d like to get hold of a couple of these to try them out.
Robin Probert at the Millennium Seed Bank then added:
What annoys me most about the USAID fact sheet promotion of Zeolite beads is that it brags the value of Zeolite beads over silica gel for small farmers drying seeds for sowing. We have known for decades that the problem facing local farmers is the rapid loss in viability that can occur if seeds remain at high ambient relative humidity combined with warm temperatures. We also know that if farmers were able to dry seeds from say 80% equilibrium relative humidity (eRH) to below 50% eRH, seed longevity would be improved by several fold. This could mean the difference between seeds surviving for only a few months to a few years.
The fact sheet boldly states (with a nice graph to make the point) that ‘Zeolite beads are more effective than silica gel in absorbing water at low relative humidity’. But this could be written another way: ‘silica gel is more effective than Zeolite beads in absorbing water at high humidities’. Fiona’s work published in Seed Science and Technology last year [Fig 5 in Hay et al (2012) SS&T 40, 374-395] elegantly confirms this.
What this means is that a farmer would need less silica gel than Zeolite beads to dry seeds from ambient humidity to a safe moisture content for short-medium term storage (≤ 50% eRH). But what about cost? The USAID leaflet states that Zeolite beads can be bought for 10-20 US $ per Kg. We buy silica gel beads that we use in our drying drums designed for small-scale seed drying for less than 10 US $ a Kg.
Using Zeolite beads to dry seeds down to very low moisture contents for long-term storage is a different matter and as Fiona’s paper demonstrates, Zeolite beads may have it over silica gel for this purpose. However, as the paper also points out, calculating the weight of Zeolite beads needed is not straightforward and compared to silica gel there is a much greater risk of over drying.
All in all, I know where my money is.
So it turns out that, on balance, according to these experts at any rate, the Zeolite beads may actually be more promising as a solution for resource-strapped genebanks around the world than for seed-saving farmers in the humid tropics. Which was, however, presumably not the aim of the USAID-supported project that came up with that factsheet. But let me tweet this to HortCRSP and see what they say. Stay tuned…
Nibbles: Mashua info, Veggies programme, Rice research, Genomes!, Indian malnutrition, Forest map, British agrobiodiversity hero, GMO “debate”, Lactose tolerance, Beer
- New Year Resolution No. 1: Take the mashua survey.
- New Year Resolution No. 2: Give the Food Programme a break, it can be not bad. As in the case of the recent episode featuring Irish Seed Savers and the only uniquely British veg.
- New Year Resolution No. 3: Learn to appreciate hour-plus talks by CG Centre DGs. And other publicity stunts…
- New Year Resolution No. 4: Give a damn about the next genome. Well, actually…
- New Year Resolution No. 5: Try to understand what people think may be going on with malnutrition in India. If anything.
- New Year Resolution No. 6: Marvel at new maps without fretting about how difficult to use they may be.
- New Year Resolution No. 7: Do not snigger at the British honours system.
- New Year Resolution No. 8: Disengage from the whole are-GMOs-good-or-bad? thing. It’s the wrong question, and nobody is listening anyhow.
- New Year Resolution No. 9: Ignore the next lactose tolerance evolution story. They’re all the same.
- New Year Resolution No. 10: Stop obsessing about beer. But not yet. No, not yet.
- Happy 2013!
Nibbles: Maya nut, Afroculinaria, Biofortification, CGIAR genebanks, FAO data, Rice drought, Bioregions, Sustainable intensification, Caviar, Beer
- Had no idea there were so many Maya nuts around. Glad Jeremy reminded me. And some Central Asian nuts for balance.
- The best of Afroculinaria.
- The best of HarvestPlus. Oh for the time to do a mashup. Anyway, does this count? And what’s that you say? You have a paper you’re writing on the subject?
- CIP genebank sees CIMMYT’s ISO accreditation (certification? whatever) and raises it a new piece of software. ILRI genebank doubles down.
- One Data Portal to Rule them All. At FAO. Somewhat underwhelming, frankly.
- Rice boffins target drought-stressed villages
- New map of bioregions. In the Daily Mail?
- Sustainable intensification debate gets nowhere. Pretty cynical note to leave you with, don’t you think?
- Ok, so here’s something a little more festive. California caviar.
- And some beer to go with that.
CIMMYT genebank ISO certified at last
The CIMMYT Maize and Wheat Germplasm Bank achieved ISO9001:2008 certification this week, after nearly two years of data gathering, intensive analysis, and assessment of processes and best practices. The ISO standards relate to quality management systems and are designed to help organizations ensure that they meet the needs of customers and other stakeholders, while meeting statutory and regulatory requirements. The CIMMYT Maize and Wheat Germplasm Bank is the first CGIAR germplasm bank to achieve ISO9001 certification, and is now one of only three genebanks globally to achieve certification (and the first outside of Europe). CIMMYT staff and areas involved in this certification included both the germplasm banks, human resources, purchasing, risk management, security, maintenance, and ICT departments. A special thanks is extended to Bibiana Espinosa and Paulina Gonzalez, both of whom sheparded the lengthy process to this noteworthy conclusion.
That’s from CIMMYT’s Informa newsletter, No. 1823, dated 23 November-7 December 2012. I got it as a pdf but have not been able to find it online. Maybe someone at CIMMYT can help me out. Anyway, congratulations to everyone at the genebank. Meanwhile, if you have strong ideas about ISO for genebanks, either way, you can leave them here.
LATER: And here is the online announcement.