Brainfood: Millet diversity, Maize landraces and hybrids, Potato carotenoids, Wheat domestication, Value chains, Population modeling, Rhizobium diversity, Yeast diversity, Core collection, Wild Zea, Cotton geneflow, Forest fires, Forest diseases

Nibbles: Blé tendre, Colloquium, Kenyan veg, Sharing vs Sparing, Rice, Tomatillos, Walnuts

Home of the potato

Puka MurunkiWilla AjawiriPuka Piña Yuraq Qewillu ("Eagle's Claw") Azul Kanchillo Pusi Piña
Yana Puma Makin ("Hand of the Puma")Amarilla Alq'a Shucre ("Snake") Puka Milkush Criolla NegraLaram Ajanwiri
 Chaucha Roja OjonaWari WaytaHuamantanga Mantequilla Yana Acero Suytu Yana Shiri
Yana Piña Kanka Weq'o Peruanita Pitikiña Wuayuro Pamela Anderson, Director General of the International Potato Center in Lima, Peru

Home of the potato, a set by PRI’s The World on Flickr.

Today’s PRI piece on how an old potato is helping Andean farmers cope with climate change also points to some fun spud photos (see above) which are in fact all of potatoes, unlike in the recent NatGeo disaster. And to a great video of CIP Director General Pamela Anderson eating chips (crisps), which she really shouldn’t do because they’re not very healthy (the chips, not the potatoes), but what the hell.

Protected areas in China: more and better needed

A big article in BioScience looks at the state of nature reserves in China, and finds them lacking. According to the press release:

Protected area managers in many cases currently lack basic data about which plant species are present on their reserves and even the exact area and extent of the reserves. Consequently, the effects of China’s rapid economic development, the related spread of invasive species, and the growth of tourism could drive to extinction species that could be sources of future crops and medicine.

Some things worth mentioning, from the article itself. ((I’ve made it available here because BioScience’s naming scheme means it won’t be available as easily next month.)) First, nice to see crop wild relatives getting a look in, although there is no mention of the agricultural biodiversity already being used by farmers either in the protected areas or outside them. Secondly, although the authors suggest preserving “very rare and threatened species” in some of China’s more than 140 botanic gardens, they don’t talk about conservation in genebanks, and they don’t talk about incentives for in-situ or on-farm conservation. In fact, the only incentives mentioned are those government should offer to persuade people to move out of the protected areas and into the cities.

So, once again, people are the problem. “Conflicts between the interests of rural communities and nature conservation need to be resolved,” and the way to do that is to move the people out of the way of conservation.

China has an opportunity to lead the world in developing a coherent conservation policy for plants important to agriculture, one that recognises the importance of diversity (as much Chinese agriculture has done), that integrates the various different forms of conservations, and that enlists the people who actually interact with plant diversity, manage it, even if only by default, and thus help to determine its future.