Dietary diversity improves nutrition

An absolutely fascinating paper from FANTA (Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance) reports the outcome of a study of Dietary Diversity as a Measure of Women’s Diet Quality in Resource-Poor Areas: Results from Rural Bangladesh Site. I’ve only read the Executive Summary, I confess, but the take-home messages are clear.

Our results from rural Bangladesh indicate that micronutrient intakes were very inadequate indeed. We note that intakes were inadequate for all micronutrients, not just those that are the usual focus of public health interventions (iron/folate during pregnancy, vitamin A, and iodine). The major deficits identified here will not be alleviated by programs narrowly focused on one or several micronutrients.

How then can those deficits be alleviated?

The study developed a range of indicators of dietary diversity and dietary quality, based on women’s recollections of what they had eaten during the previous 24 hours and assessing how well that delivered each of 11 micronutrients. Even for women who were getting far less than the recommended amounts, those who ate a more diverse diet nevertheless got more micronutrients, and this was independent of the total amount of food they ate.

Although other food groups were eaten in small quantities, they provided substantial proportions of the folate, vitamin A, vitamin C, and calcium in the diet, and all of the vitamin B12 (because this last is found only in animal-source foods). The most nutritionally important of these other food groups, in roughly descending order of importance in the diet, were dark green leafy vegetables; fish; nuts and seeds; dairy; “other” vegetables; vitamin C-rich vegetables; eggs; and vitamin C-rich fruits.

These analyses showed that the increases in nutrient intakes and adequacy that accompany increases in diversity result both from increased total intakes (reflected in energy intakes) and from increases in the nutrient density of the diet.

Dark green leafy vegetables, fish, nuts and seeds; these are not terribly difficult things to grow and make available at a very local level. The health benefits are immense, and because of the effects of maternal nutrition on the growth and development of their children would be felt for years. But how many governments, how many aid agencies and charities, how many projects, are actually pushing dietary diversity as a solution to malnutrition?

How much would Kenyans pay for yellow maize?

We’ve blogged a few times about the preference for white maize in Africa, despite the nutritional advantages of the yellow kind. A recent paper in Food Policy puts some numbers on that. It also gives an historical explanation for the preference, at least for Kenya:

The high demand for maize for the war industry and the support of strong lobbying efforts by European settlers, combined with pest problems in millet and sorghum, made maize the major food crop in Kenya by the time of the First World War. A major turning point was when the marketing board started to refuse to buy yellow maize. From then on, only white maize was grown in the central highlands. The maize research program in Kenya, one of the most successful in the region, produced many improved varieties but, given the established market preferences and focus on the highlands, all those were white. It can thus be argued that the dominance of white dent varieties in East Africa was a case of path dependency, caused by a range of favoring factors ([Rubey et al., 1997] and [Smale and Jayne, 2003]). Furthermore, once people are used to a particular food with particular characteristics these characteristics easily become preferred traits.

The numbers are striking. In a survey conducted at small mills, kiosks and supermarkets, 600 consumers asked for a price discount of a third to a half for yellow maize. They were willing to pay a premium for fortified maize, but of only 6-7%. The adoption of biofortified varieties clearly faces a daunting challenge:

We conclude that substantial efforts will be needed to make biofortified, yellow maize varieties acceptable to the urban consumers. A reduction in price would clearly help, and lower income consumers would be more responsive, but the price difference would have to be substantial. Formal education seems to increase the preference for white maize and has no effect on the preference for fortified. Therefore, special educational and awareness programs seem indicated. Further research is, however, needed to assess what information and awareness is needed for consumers to change their behavior. To develop appropriate awareness campaigns, the sources of this type of information need to be assessed.

What price leafy greens?

Nibbles: Angola, Peas, Water, Root & tubers, Pollination, Coffee & chocolate, Worms