Posts

Posted on

Home is where you make it

Professor Roy Ellen, the project director, said: “This project aims to better understand the levels of agrobiodiversity found in home gardens – that is those gardens intimately linked to individual households. For example, we want to know where seed and other plant material comes from, whether it is purchased or obtained informally, who gives and receives it; who receives vegetable produce, and the economic scale of such exchanges. We wish to learn how people learn to become good home gardeners. Whilst biological diversity in itself is important, so are the skills and knowledge that maintain it.”

If you were a reasonably active member of this community and you read the above quotation you might just possibly think, “Ah. Another project to explore the value of agricultural biodiversity and the social networks that support it in some far-flung corner of the developing world. Nepal, maybe, or Burkina Faso.”

But you would be wrong. For the quote comes from an announcement of a project to study home gardens in that most English of settings, Kent. ((I’m giving it more space than Luigi’s original nibble, because I think it is worth it.)) This is exactly the sort of thing I think is sorely needed to forge links among people worldwide. I’ve not been able to find out that much more about the project, although it seems that at least some people at the University of Kent are admirably qualified. And both the Eden Project and the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, “will help with the dissemination of the project output”. I hope that means that they will draw the connections to home gardeners everywhere.

Posted on

African food blogging

Emeka Okafor over at Timbuktu Chronicles points to a blog that sounds really fascinating: BetumiBlog. Betumi is the African Culinary Network. It “connects anyone who delights in African cuisine, foodways, and food history.” BetumiBlog is run by Fran Osseo-Asare, who is clearly incredibly knowledgeable and enthusiastic about African food and cooking. She has contributed a chapter on Food and Foodways to the Sub-Saharan Africa volume of The Greenwood Encyclopedia of World Popular Culture ((Edited by Dennis Hickey, with Gary Hoppenstand the general editor of the series.)). That includes a very useful table summarizing the many different ways Africans prepare their starchy staples. My personal score is nine.

Posted on

Selling agriculture to students

Californian agriculture schools are on a recruiting drive, apparently. They’re adding things like “environmental studies” to their names and using slogans such as “Agricultural Research is UDDERLY Awesome” to broaden their appeal. But why not make more of the astonishing variety of crops, livestock and associated organisms — agrobiodiversity — to attract students? People love diversity. How about: “Save the Knobbed Russet: study horticulture.” Ok, you can no doubt come up with something better…

Posted on

Quemada!

Jeremy asked recently whether shifting agriculture ((Also called slash-and-burn and swidden cultivation, and tavy in Malagasy.)) can really support growing populations. I’ve just come across (via the PLEC newsletter) a paper from Madagascar ((E. Styger, H.M. Rakotondramasy, M.J. Pfeffer, E.C.M. Fernandes and D.M. Bates 2007. Influence of slash-and-burn farming practices on fallow succession and land degradation in the rainforest region of Madagascar.  Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 119: 257-269.)) which says maybe.

Its objectives

were to analyze jointly with the Betsimisaraka farmers how slash-and-burn practices influence fallow species succession, and how current fallow/cropping regimes influence agricultural productivity and upland degradation dynamics.

The researchers conclude, from discussions with farmers and botanical surveys, that fallow periods have been cut by up to two thirds — to 3-5 years — in the past 30 years. This means that fallow land goes from having plentiful pigeon wood trees on it to bare, dry unproductive grassland in 5-6 rice cropping cycles, after which agriculture is no longer possible. After each cycle, the land needs to be left fallow for increasing lengths of time in order for the soil to recover fertility: “already with the third cycle after deforestation, vegetation starts to degrade quickly in parallel with agricultural productivity decline.”

The findings of this paper indicate that the tavy system with its currently short fallow periods is collapsing.

The main culprit is fire. As fallows become more herbaceous, fire is more difficult to control, and wildfires escape more easily, often “eliminating a productive plot of land for agriculture without getting any benefits of production.”

So what can be done? Try to take fire out of the equation, certainly. “The restoration of soil fertility should build on the biological potential of the system, by optimizing nutrient cycling (e.g. through residue and weed recycling, mulching) and by producing and recycling of high quality organic matter (e.g. through improved fallows and cover crops).” The key to the adoption and success of these practices will be engagement with the young, according to the authors:

The careful development of alternative agricultural practices should especially be done in collaboration with young farmers. If the young obtain a real interest in agricultural intensification, they may not feel the need anymore to leave their native villages and migrate to the forest border to undertake tavy.