The outline of a deal for a better MLS?

Where are we with the whole enhancing the functioning of the Plant Treaty’s Multilateral System thing? I’m glad you asked. You’ll remember that

[h]istorically, parties have been divided between creating a subscription-only system of payment upon registration, and maintaining a single-access option along the lines of the benefit-sharing payments under the current SMTA.

Well, at a meeting of the relevant committee last week in Rome there was a proposal from the co-chairs for a…

…single subscription mechanism with two alternative triggers for mandatory monetary benefit-sharing: an early payment upon registration or a deferred payment upon commercialization of a product incorporating material from the MLS.

Much remains to be done, but this is being seen as a bit of a “procedural breakthrough.” Fingers crossed.

Brainfood: Diverse ecologists, Wild vs cultivated, Ecosystem services, Indigenous people, Mixtures, On-farm trees, Monitoring protected areas, Social media & protected areas, Wild harvesting, Land sparing vs sharing, Agroecology & plant health, Wild vs cultivated

Nibbles: Svalbard Global Seed Vault, CePaCT genebank, CIAT genebank, Australia rice genebank, Bangladesh genebank, Maize mutants garden, Inoculants genebank, Millets community seedbank, Payments for Agrobiodiversity Conservation Services, Triadic Comparison of Technology Options, Crop diversity, Intercropping, Agroforestry, Diet diversity, World economy, Sustainable food

  1. Never thought I’d see the Svalbard Global Seed Vault in Psychology Today, yet here we are.
  2. The Pacific’s regional genebank is set for more work on lesser-known crops. Too bad most of them won’t be able to go to Svalbard.
  3. How to make a genebank beautiful as well as sustainable.
  4. Australia has a rice genebank. For some reason.
  5. Bangladesh gets a new genebank. Could have sworn it already had one.
  6. Mutants need a genebank too.
  7. And inoculants.
  8. Community-level genebanks have their place too. Though probably not for mutants.
  9. As long as the farmers get a benefit, of course.
  10. Tricot is a good way of evaluating all that stuff in genebanks.
  11. But you should also genotype it.
  12. Why bother with all this? Andreas Volz has a nice explanation.
  13. Genetic diversity is all very good, but don’t forget to intercrop.
  14. Which includes agroforestry.
  15. For a more varied diet.
  16. And a better world economy.
  17. And a more sustainable food system.

The olive’s second act?

Is Xylella — cause of the olive plague that has been stalking southern Europe for a decade — a blessing in disguise for the Salento? Jeremy asks the hard questions in his latest Eat This Podcast. Spoiler alert: Silvestro Silvestori thinks it might just be:

…at the heart of Xylella and the Salento is an identity crisis, that we’re all the children of farmers, we’re all farmers ourselves. And for most people, that’s not the case any longer. And there’s not a lot of industry left here as far as farming. So I think first we have to look at ourselves in the mirror and say, what are we?

Fascinating insights throughout, so listen to the whole thing. And wonder whether this will help.

Brainfood: Pacific plant use, Rapa Nui crops, E African crops, Cotton domestication, Fertile Crescent Neolithic, Dutch Neolithic, S Italy crops, Rice domestication, Maize domestication