Uniting the conversation

We recently read Sweeping the Sleaze, by Oliver Reichenstein, ((Thanks to Daring Fireball.)) and agreed with much of what he said. So we got rid of the various sharing buttons on this blog, which weren’t actually being used all that much. But then, how to bring the conversations on various social sites together? Reichenstein answers the same rhetorical question thusly:

Is there a better way to “integrate Social Media”? Well, why don’t you just post the best reactions on the bottom of the article? Like this:

So we might try that. Over on Facebook, for example, Dirk Enneking, who thinks sourdough is superior to yeast ((With which I agree.)) had this to say in response to my comment that a sourdough without yeast would be a very sorry affair.

@ Jeremy, it depends on who you subscribe to, some sourdoughs include yeasts, others are more purist: lB=Lactobacillus Lb. sanfransiscensis, Lb. farciminis, Lb. fermentum, Lb. brevis, Lb. plantarum, Lb. amylovorus, Lb. reuteri, Lb. pontis, Lb. panis, Lb. alimentarius, W. ciboria (F. Leroy, L. De Vuyst / Trends in Food Science & Technology 15 (2004) 67–78_

To which I responded:

@Dirk Enneking I wonder; the article you cite is a specifically industrial view of a culture for fermentation that is designed with uniformity and other “important functionality” in mind. I would be willing to bet that any starter culture (and sourdough is often a misnomer as the resulting bread can be not in the least sour) used by artisanal bakers and home bakers would contains yeasts as well as lactobacilli and other bacteria. But then, you probably know that: http://sourdough.com/forum/fake-sourdough

That last link is a dig at the fact that Dirk is in Australia, home of major fake sourdoughness.

The big question, of course, is whether we should continue to follow Reichenstein’s advice and copy conversations here. What do you reckon?

Normal service to be resumed, eventually

Sorry about the light blogging on my part lately, ((And thanks to Jeremy for keeping up his end despite having to strategize himself out of assorted paper bags.)) due to being on the road with other things on my mind. When that happens in the future, as it probably will next week, do check up on us on Twitter, Facebook and Scoop.it, as there may still be some micro-blogging going on among the packing and unpacking. But you knew that.

And we’re off

As is customary at this time of year, we’re taking a break. see you on or around 9 January 2012. Meanwhile, here’s a little something to tide you over, which we think admirably expresses our philosophy here at ABD towers.

Mea culpa

The best thing about blogs is that they allow an immediate reaction. The worst thing about blogs is that, well, they allow an immediate reaction. So it kind of behooves the blogger to highlight the times when more considered reflection might have been appropriate. There have been two such times recently. So let me set the record straight.

First, those pesky cucumbers. It has been pointed out to me that resistance to Cucumber Green Mottle Mosaic Virus (CGMMV) has not in fact yet been found, contrary to what I suggested in my post of a couple of days back. I misinterpreted the results of the evaluation data made available on the CGN website, because I don’t know enough about the subject. So no finder’s fee for me, alas. But on the plus side, I did learn a lot about cucumbers. And also that if you’re going to look for data on cucumbers, it helps to know something about cucumbers.

Second, that SE Asia regional seed bank stuff. There I was guilty of jumping to a conclusion. There were clues in the original article, and also in the official documents I dug up, that should have warned me that we were talking here about a repository of relatively large quantities of high-quality seed of new, modern varieties, not smallish samples of traditional landraces. And indeed I was suspicious, and sent out feelers to various people who I felt sure would know more. Sure, the documents were ambiguous, but if I had just waited until the experts’ replies were in, I could have simply clarified the situation, rather than accusing the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation of ignoring their national genebanks and the international collections at their disposal in their rush to establish an arguably unnecessary regional structure. So apologies to them. And thanks for teaching me that a seed bank is not always the same as a genebank.

Ok, but of course none of this means that I won’t shoot from the hip again in future. It’s probably way too late for me to learn that lesson.

So we were missed, after all

Easing back into the never-ending treadmill that is blogging, I thought I’d share with you one reader’s appreciation of our efforts:

Thanks for writing on this subject. There’s a bunch of important technical information on the internet nowadays. You’ve got a lot of that info here on your blog. I’m highly impressed – I try to keep a couple of blogs pretty neat, but it’s seemingly impossible at times. You have done a solid job with this one in particular. How do you manage to do it?

Thanks for that sincere and heartfelt praise, Mr Spammy, of Tips to Losing Weight, and in answer to your penetrating question, sometimes I wonder myself.