- Rare breed of cattle affected by climate change.
- MoBot to host conference on Global Plant Conservation Strategy, 5-7 July 2011
- Russian wildfires expected to be worse this year. What price wheat?
- GOOD gets its head around the meaning of “grain”. As in “15-grain bread in supermarkets”.
- Sudan Agricultural Research Corporation’s Plant Genetic Resources Programme popped up in my Reader. No idea why.
- Uganda’s farmers discover the value of sunflowers.
Sheath blight misidentified?
This is why I love the internets.
A week ago, my compadre Luigi blogged about an interesting study by scientists at IRRI. They used plant architecture as a proxy for disease susceptibility, specifically to Rhizoctonia solani, the fungus that causes sheath blight in rice. 1 Luigi illustrated the post with an IRRI photograph of sheath blight symptoms. He then drew the attention of all and sundry to the post, which is when the fun began.
Quick as winking, someone at IRRI pointed out:
“The photo is not at all about sheath blight, but it does not matter!”
They were informed that the photo had been tagged “sheathblight” 2 on IRRI’s photostream at flickr, which is where Luigi had found it. It could be changed.
“Yes,” said the person responsible for IRRI’s photos. “Tell us what it is and we can fix it.”
Back came the reply.
“I cannot tell you with any certainty what this is supposed to represent. What I am really sure is that this is not sheath blight.”
To which bystanders could only add “Photographs also in database hell?”
IRRI has done the right thing; the offending photo is not currently visible. Luckily we had downloaded it ourselves, rather than relying on its continued availability. And in case you were wondering, this is sheath blight.
I think … We got it from the American Phytopathological Society, and they surely know, right?
FAO says Save and Grow
The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations has launched Save and Grow, “a major new initiative” that calls for “sustainable crop production intensification”. Read the book, watch the video, then stand back as food production doubles by 2050 in developing countries.
The new approach calls for targeting mainly smallholder farmers in developing countries. [It] will enable them to maximize yields and invest the savings in their health and education. … In order to grow, agriculture must learn to save. … [T]he Save and Grow toolkit include[s] precision irrigation … and “precision placement” of fertilizers. … Integrated pest management … is yet another key element. Such methods help adapt crops to climate change and … [a]verage yields from farms practicing the techniques in 57 low-income countries increased almost 80 percent, according to one review.
And there you have it.
Where will the protein come from?
As everyone and her dog ventures an opinion of how much more food will be needed to properly feed how many more mouths by when, it is worth bearing in mind an idea that was a little bit hidden in Oliver Morton’s wonderful introduction to The Anthropocene, in The Economist a couple of weeks ago.
Although nitrogen fixation is not just a gift of life — it has been estimated that 100m people were killed by explosives made with industrially fixed nitrogen in the 20th century’s wars — its net effect has been to allow a huge growth in population. About 40% of the nitrogen in the protein that humans eat today got into that food by way of artificial fertiliser. There would be nowhere near as many people doing all sorts of other things to the planet if humans had not sped the nitrogen cycle up.
There’s a chart, too.
Industrial nitrogen fixation does not, of course, require oil, but it does require lots of cleaner, cheaper energy, and there’s still no sign of that just around the corner.
Wallow Fire (may) threaten (some) wild beans. Maybe.
There’s a really bad fire spreading in Arizona. 3
You can donwload all kinds of stuff about it, and even post your experiences of it on Facebook. But can you find out whether any crop wild relatives are threatened by it? Well, sure: all you have to do is go off to GBIF, and choose a likely genus (Phaseolus, say), and download the records, and mash them up in Google Earth with the latest fire perimeter data or whatever. 4 Like I’ve done here:
Coming in closer, and using the NASA GeoTIFF instead of the normal Google Earth imagery, you can put yourself in the position of being able to make some reasonably intelligent guesses about what might be happening to some of these populations, and the genepool as a whole in the area:
But what I really meant is that there ought to be a way to do this automagically, or something. Anyway, it is sobering to reflect that while all hell is breaking loose in Arizona, not that far away to the northeast, in the peaceful surroundings of the Denver Botanical Garden, Anasazi beans are enjoying their day in the sun, utterly oblivious of the mortal threat faced by some of their wild cousins. It’s a cruel world. And there’s a point in all this about the need for complementary conservation strategies that’s just waiting to be made. Isn’t there?