When diversity is A Bad Thing

We generally adopt the view that diversity is a good thing. But there are cases where it definitely is not. One such is being discussed over at Small Things Considered, “the microbe blog”. In part one, Elio Schaechter answers Five Questions about Oomycetes. Number one: What makes oomycetes important to people? Answer, potato blight, and many other diseases.

Lots of good stuff, but we’re particularly taken with his colleague Merry Youle’s addition on Oomycete mating types and the potato blight. The point is, late blight is now capable of sex outside its home in Mexico, and has been since the late 1970s. Two consequences follow. First, the spores of sexual reproduction are capable of surviving over winter; currently, cold winters destroy the asexual spores giving potato growers a fighting chance of avoiding the blight. Over-wintering spores could be a disaster. Secondly, and perhaps more important in the long term, sexual recombination will allow late blight to do its own gene shuffling, and could come up with new combinations of genetic diversity that could make it even more virulent. Fungicide resistance in over-wintering spores would be quite a threat. Youle concludes:

K. V. Raman, a professor of plant breeding at Cornell University and an authority on potatoes in Mexico and Eastern Europe, observes: The conditions prevalent in today’s Russia are all too reminiscent of those of Ireland in the mid-19th century. That was the time of the Great Famine in Ireland (the subject of our next post). As was the case then in Ireland, Russia today has a population dependent on the potato and an aggressive blight out of control. In this, Russia is not alone. This time, the impacts are expected to be global.

Scary, or what? I’m looking forward to two more posts promised on the subject.

Nibbles: Climate, Money, Wine, Rice, Photosynthesis, Diversity

Nibbles: Rice domestication, H5N1, Fisheries, Crop maps, Grafting, Livestock video, Perennial conference, Goat genetic patterns, Satellites, Large seeds, W4RA

Nibbles: Edible terricolous insects, Interdependence, Spanish livestock, Milk for pastoralists, African Crop Science Society, Ethiopia CBD report, New Agriculturalist, Geo-referencing

Tracking down rice genetic erosion numbers

So, Olivier de Schutter, the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to food, who teaches at the University of Louvain in Belgium and Columbia University in the United States, has been talking to reporters about the dangers of genetic erosion:

He noted that in Sri Lanka in 1959, for example, some 2,000 varieties of rice were cultivated, whereas today, there are fewer than 100, and some 75 per cent of agro-biodiversity has been lost as a result of the pressure towards to the adoption of uniform improved seed varieties.

We know where the 75% figures comes from, and that it is, frankly, rubbish. What about the other two?

Two thousand Sri Lankan landraces is not implausible. There are 2028 rice landrace accessions in the IRRI genebank, 25 of which have georeferences. So, with various caveats, if I didn’t have any other information, I wouldn’t feel too uncomfortable about using that number for the pre-Green Revolution diversity of rice in that country.

But actually there is other information. The full version of de Schutter’s report, which he kindly sent us, had a reference for the number 1, and thanks to our friend Maria Garruccio at the Bioversity International library we tracked it down. It in turn gives the number as coming from Part 2 of the book “Uses and Values of Biodiversity,” under the section “Biodiversity and Economics,” pages 426-427. The information can be found in a couple of tables.

table2

table1

So that sent us to R.E. Rhoades‘ 1991 article in National Geographic “The world’s food supply at risk2 This is a new one on me. Here’s the relevant bit:

In Sri Lanka, where farmers grew some 2 ,000 traditional varieties of rice as recently as 1959, only five principal varieties are grown today. In India, which once had 30,000 varieties of rice, more than 75 percent of total production comes from fewer than ten varieties.

Alas, there’s no reference given for those numbers, but I’m pursuing this further. Prof. Rhoades is not listed as a rice donor to IRRI, though he did work at CIP for some years. But his companion during his trip to Sri Lanka for National Geographic, Balendira Soma Sundaram 3 is, according to IRRI’s databases, a collector of 257 accessions from 3 IRRI collecting missions to that country (1979, 1984, 1988). So he should know.

Incidentally, some 60 improved rice varieties have been released in Sri Lanka since 1964 again according to IRRI’s database. INGER monitors such things.