Agricultural Biodiversity Weblog
Crops, animals, wild relatives ...
Our cartography nut is otherwise engaged, temporarily, but I know he’d love this one. Blue shows agricultural production consumed directly by people: food. Orange-red is consumed indirectly in processed products, mostly feed for livestock but also things like cotton and coffee. Notice anything interesting about the distribution? Yeah, me too.
Hat tip to Resilience Science, which gives links to the original study.
Previous post: Names from the Biodiversity Heritage Library
Next post: Vineyards benefit from integrated pest management
Penny has an intriguing idea about black rice:
“Dr Xu says he’s like to see Louisiana farmers growing black rice”Or, we could just buy it from the countries where it is indigenous to. That way, the farmers who actually developed it would benefit from producing it.
She has reasons, too, good ones.
Who’s tweeting Medvedev
{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }
The yellows and reds may be even more pronounced as the biofuel fad heats up….What is going on with northeast Brasil and Ivory Coast? That area of Brazil is the poorest in the entire country. And Ivory coast is poor. But they are red and yellow. An error in the data? Or are these areas producing lots of feed and processed food?
I’m not sure, but I suspect that the two cases you mention are growing cacao and, maybe, soy for feed and export.
from wikipedia… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_C%C3%B4te_d‘Ivoire
“Côte d’Ivoire is among the world’s largest producers and exporters of coffee, cocoa beans, and palm oil.”
Starbucks, chocolate, and biofuels, all in one nonfood package
Rich