I’ve blogged before about the myth of the pristine forest, at least as it applies to the Amazon, and a long feature in the University of Chicago Magazine entitled Can’t See the Forest for the Trees does a good job of summarizing that argument. But it does a lot more by putting it in a global context. I hadn’t realized that researchers that see the Amazon as a “working landscape” are increasingly finding kindred thinkers in other parts of the world: in the “secret forests” of El Salvador, the greening Sahel, the tea forests of China. There’s a lot of talk nowadays in such circles of the “social life of forests” ((That’s in fact the title of a conference organized in May by the University of Chicago’s Program on the Global Environment.)) and about local communities taking back control, and becoming “gardners of the forests,” in the words of Peter Crane, formerly Director at Kew. Says Chris Reij of the Centre for International Cooperation at the VU University Amsterdam:
“The foresters have the idea that they have to protect trees from farmers. Our own view is that forests have to be protected from foresters.â€
Hi,
The s0-called new conservation is just an excuse to groom the Earth. If you cannot stop developers/foresters you join them and redefine the problem so there is no problem. The Bush administration (USA) was very good at doing this. Now some ecology writers are falling for this distortion and saying, “Hasn’t anybody ever thought of redefining the terms?”
Dick Stafursky
Brattleboro, VT
http://wslfconwaymausa.blogspot.com/search/label/Help%20-%20Forestry%20%22Helps%22%20The%20Forest